Archive | LGBT rights

400 churchgoing Mormons join LGBT pride parade

Credit: religiondispatches.org

Some [straight Mormons Building] Bridges marchers worried how the crowds [in Salt Lake City] would react, especially given the history of LDS Church-backed opposition to same-sex marriage.

“But when we turned the first corner onto 200 South Street, the crowd just roared,” says Austin Hollinbaugh.

I recently lived in rural Utah for two years and was favorably impressed with LDS. The level of violence in Utah is negligible even as everyone has guns. Literacy is high. Being cordial is a valued trait. This is unquestionably due to the influence of LDS, who also genuinely takes care of their own with a private welfare system.

I don’t support the official LDS stance on gays (just as I don’t support the stance of my birth religion, the Catholic Church, on that either.) But my outsider take on LDS after being in Utah is, in their own way and own time, change is coming.

Posted in LGBT rights

Obama support for same-sex marriage as deliberate distraction

Bet you didn’t hear much about “the howling protests of an angry mob” at the Bank of America protest in Charlotte NC yesterday, yes the same state where the Democratic Convention will be held and which just voted against same-sex marriage.

The same sex marriage issue will generate an abundance of distraction running straight into the Democratic Convention, which will be held…where else? In Charlotte.

So which city gets rewarded with the substantial economic shot of the Democratic Convention? BAC Gay Basher Town USA.

What a nice piece of misdirection. Pure coincidence?

Consider this. HRC has appointed Obama crony Lloyd Blankfein, the CEO of Goldman, to be a national corporate spokesperson for same-sex marriage. Thus, Obama’s bankster buddy gets a chance to pretend to redeem himself in the public eye.

Persuaded? As I have said before, in matters of crony capitalism, nothing happens by accident.

You can be assured that same sex marriage will become a central issue while neither candidate talks about the criminality of bankers.

Posted in Banksters, LGBT rights

Sheriff Paul Babeu and his gay ex-lover

wikimedia commons

Pinal County AZ Sheriff Paul Babeu says he did not threaten his Mexican ex-lover with deportation and, oh yeah, he’s gay.

“I am gay,” Babeu said, but the charges against me are “completely false.”

While it’s remarkable to see a Republican figure of national stature publicly embrace his homosexuality, and give such a forceful conservative defense of gay rights, that’s not the real issue here. As far as we can tell Paul Babeu has never taken any public positions contrary to his now very public homosexuality.

Babeu has always struck me as someone who does what he says he will. Some of the desert in his area is mostly controlled by drug and human smugglers. He’s not real fond of them or of illegals, is an ally of the odious Sheriif Joe Arpaio, and sharply conservative. But he didn’t dodge the gay issue, and that is to be hugely commended.

We will soon know if the allegations against him are true.

Posted in LGBT rights

Civil unions for all. Marriage in a church if you want to

In a previous blog entry on “Mr. Conservative” Barry Goldwater, Sr. I explained how a truly principled conservative was a staunch defender of LGBTI rights well before that position was popular — even with many liberals. That sparked an exchange of ideas between a conservative friend and myself.

Posted in LGBT rights

Why home modifications don’t work–An exclusive


Bank of America cubicles emptied of the 99% employees who used to do home loan modifications for the rest of the 99%

Revolutions all over the world have been demonstrating just how critical the internet is to the modern world.  It can be used to oppress and it can be used to free people from oppression.  Wikileaks and other websites like it show how technology can be used to promote secrecy or to promote transparency.

Here is an exclusive peak into why the federally mandated home modification program HAMP (Home Affordable Modification Program) isn’t working (http://www.makinghomeaffordable.gov/programs/lower-payments/Pages/hamp.aspx) for the overwhelming numbers of the 99% people who need it.  If you empty the cubicles of most of the workers who are supposed to process HAMP modifications nothing will get done and nobody will be helped.

A Bank of America whistle blower sent the photo to India.  This is where being a private investigator for over 30 years and having served more than twice as long as Chairman of the Board of CALI (California Association of Licensed Investigators, the world’s largest organization of private detectives) pays off:  it went right to somebody in my international network of private eyes, spies, and other assorted sleuths and came right back into my inbox.  I blogged previously about the former Countrywide Mortgage (now acquired by Bank of America) executives who gave campaign contributions to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Phil Angelides and how one former Countrywide executive had to be talked out of having me murdered by his lawyers:  http://janbtucker.com/blog/2011/12/22/radicalism-is-the-conservativism-of-tomorrow/.  That blog apparently prompted a new whistle blower to come forward with the interesting tidbit about how Bank of America is cutting costs while insuring that the HAMP operation will accomplish little or nothing for the American people.

It’s not like sacking everybody made the operation work substantially worse though.  All it has done is make it working more atrociously than before.  As of 2009 the statistics were that Bank of America only allowed 4% of its applicants to actually modify their loans:  http://www.consumerwarningnetwork.com/2009/08/31/home-loan-modification-run-around-continues/.  Bank of America probably figures that statistically, getting rid of most of its loan modification employees won’t even be noticed and can be attributed to the length of time that the program has been in operation.  Company executives can always tell congress that they’ve already processed all the meritorious qualifying applicants and so that’s why their percentage of approved modifications is slacking off.


A commemorative poster of the burning of the Isla Vista Bank of America that came out spoofing the first custom “scenic checks”

President Thomas Jefferson said that “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.”  This danger became self-evident when former FBI Cril Payne wrote after leaving the agency that the February 25, 1970 burning of the Isla Vista (Santa Barbara) Branch of Bank of America by anti-war students was actually instigated by the FBI’s COINTELPRO program.  Legitimate protests against Bank of America’s support for the Vietnam War was exploited by the government to discredit the anti-war movement by instigating acts of vandalism and violence.  Later that year, in April 1970, the police wound up shooting UC Santa Barbara student Kevin Moran while he was trying to put out a fire at the temporary Bank of America facility set up after the February 25th incident.


Bank of America Isla Vista February 25, 1970

A couple of buddies of mine from the California Peace & Freedom Party were at the February 25, 1970 event.  One, Gay activist Sandy Blixton, liberated a ream of Bank of America letterheads from the trash the day after the bank burning.  It had been in the vault and so had survived the fire, but was considered garbage by the Banksters since it had been singed all around the edges from the heat.  Sandy sold each of the 500 letterheads for upwards of $100 each to anti-war activists as souvenirs to finance his continuing actions for Gay liberation and against the war…..at least some decency came out of this otherwise indecent fiasco.


Thomas Jefferson

Another thing that Thomas Jefferson once said is instructive if you think you can kick back and be complacent about the state of affairs in America:

God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all and always well-informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions, it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had thirteen States independent for eleven years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century and a half for each State. What country before ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion? And what country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon, and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure.

If you are fed up with politics and economics as usual and want to fight back against the banks with organizations that are ethical and committed to rectifying the wrongs of our system, go to:

http://www.hsitrust.org

and

http://ikeepmyhome.com/

Posted in Anti-war, corporatism, LGBT rights

2 women share 1st kiss at US Navy ship’s return

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

It’s a tradition at Navy homecomings that one sailor is chosen by raffle to be first off the ship to kiss a loved one. Wednesday, for the first time, the reunited couple was same-sex.

The crowd screamed and waved flags around them.

Posted in LGBT rights

Where is Mr Conservative when we need him?

I’ve been waiting with baited breath to see just how mondo-bizarro the Republican race for the presidential nomination could get.  It started at the bottom and has been working its way down ever since.

It is so strange that it makes me long for a comeback by a “Mr. Conservative” in the mold of Barry Goldwater who was the undisputed champion of that moniker when I was young.  Not that I’d have voted for him when he ran for president:  I actually had a Johnson-Humphrey bumper sticker on my bicycle in 1964 riding to and from elementary school during that election.

However, history proved Barry Goldwater to have been one of the really decent and principled conservatives of our era.  What would he have said about the current crop of candidates running for the Republican Presidential nomination?

As early as 1989 he described the Republican Party as having been taken over by a “bunch of kooks.”

As a staunch defender of civil liberties he came out for the right of LGBTI people to serve openly in the military, stating emphatically that “Everyone knows that gays have served honorably in the military since at least the time of Julius Caesar” and that “You don’t have to be straight to be in the military; you just have to be able to shoot straight.”

Gay rights was not the only issue where he took on the religious right.  When it came to abortion he was a staunch and unwavering supporter of a woman’s right to choose during his final term in the United States Senate.   When Sandra Day O’Connor of his home state, Arizona, was nominated to the United States Supreme Court and opposed by Moral Majority leader Jerry Falwell who said that “Every good Christian should be concerned,” Goldwater was quoted as saying “Every good Christian ought to kick Falwell right in the ass.”  John Dean (of later Watergate fame) claimed however that what Goldwater actually said was that Falwell should be kicked “in the nuts.”

In 1994 he told the Washington Post that “When you say “radical right” today, I think of these moneymaking ventures by fellows like Pat Robertson and others who are trying to take the Republican party and make a religious organization out of it. If that ever happens, kiss politics goodbye.”  But perhaps his greatest condemnation of the transformation of the Republican Party into what it was becoming (maybe, degenerating into?) was when he warned his own party “Do not associate my name with anything you do. You are extremists, and you’ve hurt the Republican party much more than the Democrats have.”

Posted in LGBT rights, Politics

Tell Malawi: repeal anti-LGBTI laws

My hat is off to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who recently announced an initiative to insist upon equitable and fair treatment of LGBTI people as a condition for receiving USA foreign aid funds. At least one country, Malawi, has just announced a review of its laws banning LGBTI conduct.

Join with the California League of Latin American Citizens (CALLAC) in support of our “No More Denial” campaign:

Email the ambassador of Malawi to urge repeal of these laws and to demand that Malawi enforce the rights of all its citizens under the international covenant on civil and political rights!

His Excellency Steve Matenje
Ambassador
Tel: (202) 721-0270
Fax: (202) 721-0288
Email: malawidc@aol.com
Malawi to review homosexuality ban

More

Posted in LGBT rights

Don’t Ask Don’t Tell replaced with No One Cares

Doonesbury nails it.

Posted in LGBT rights

‘Don’t Go, Don’t Kill’

In the past few weeks a series of reforms have been passed which some are saying justify President Obama’s, the Democratic Party’s, and American liberals’ extreme moderation and corporatism (or, in some cases, a mere subservience to, if not an outright embrace of, this horribly corrupt form of capitalism).

However, I would advise you to consider these words which Malcolm X uttered in another terribly corrupt and unequal world which, as the US continues its decline as an empire and omnipotent economic presence, even many liberals and radicals are starting to get nostalgic for:

You don’t stick a knife into a man’s back nine inches, pull it out six inches, and call it progress.

That is, if you ignore the context in which these mild reforms are taking place, you are ignoring the fundamental problems which need to be solved.  This is particularly apparent in the case of the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.

The social critic Fran Lebowitz received a decent amount of criticism for her remarks on the gay rights movement, but – and as much as they are said tongue in cheek – they provoke a reaction, I think, because there is a degree of truth in them:

I was, of course, surprised that gay people want to get married or go into the Army because those things are so, I don’t know, dull. They’re so confining. The two most confining institutions are probably marriage and the military. I would pay to get out of either one.

Of course, the reason for these goals is understood.  A ban on gay marriage and the now-repealed policy for gay soldiers are forms of discrimination.  It is in no way a bad thing that Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is no longer the way things work.

However, the benefits of it are really very questionable, as well as expending so much energy on a goal which, in the end, will just allow more people to play their part in oppressing others.  Cindy Sheehan writes in a piece on Al Jazeera English called “Don’t Go, Don’t Kill,”

It is hard to separate this issue from the activities of the military…

…Face it, gays are now and have been in the military since before Valley Forge during the Revolutionary War.

The only difference being one can now admit their orientation without fear of official recrimination – a major boon for the equal rights movement! The capacity for increased carnage should not be celebrated as a victory!

I cannot help but think about those that are on the receiving end of US military aggression. So a minor change has occurred at the input juncture of the war machine, but the output remains the same: we dismantle systems of indigenous governance, support disingenuous often criminal overlords, commit endless acts of brutality, and worst of all leave entire nations rudderless, spiraling downwards into the same abyss that engulfs the US military’s lack of accountability.

I wonder what the response towards don’t ask, don’t will be overseas? I wonder if mothers across the Swat Valley in Northern Pakistan are cheering the repeal of the act (most likely not), gathering in the streets to celebrate a victory in the global pursuit of human equality, only to be forced to take cover as yet another hellfire-laden drone appears on the horizon…

Don’t equal human rights extend to those that the Empire has mislabeled as the “enemy”? Or do we now have to ignore the fact that innocent people are being slaughtered by the thousands

I can see how one could view the repeal as a step forward, framed in the context dictated by the political elites of the Washington beltway. I can imagine much displeasure amongst the military brass – but I cannot reiterate enough how this is not a progressive moment in the social history of the United States.

The US military is not a human rights organisation and nowhere near a healthy place to earn a living or raise a family. My email box is filled with stories of mostly straight soldiers and their families who were deeply harmed by life in the military.

Add to this the fact that a lot of activist energy was directed toward this repeal, and the question of, “Was it worth it?” emerges.  That is a hard question to answer, though, and the process of answering it would probably create more division than the answer is worth.  After all, there is now less discrimination against gays in the world – the activism is done, that specific goal has been reached.

There is a solution to this conundrum of what to do with our energy, how to make ourselves most effective and to work toward goals that are unquestionably worth our energy.  Laura Flanders of GRITtv has this one:

Manning may have acted alone, but he’s not alone.  Militant action helped change Don’t Ask Don’t Tell—and militant action is needed to get him out of solitary. And then, it’s time to take a tip from those LGBT service members. As they came out for their rights openly to serve in our wars, are wars’ opponents as willing to come out, loud and proud—leaving no-one to stand alone—against our nation’s waging of them?

And Sheehan’s frequent ally Medea Benjamin has a complementary perspective in her piece “To the Gay Community: Now That You Can Join the Military, Please Don’t:”

We know that the military is one of the only ways many young people can afford a college education these days and that the financial crisis severely limits this generation’s career options. But we still encourage young men and women to look for other opportunities that don’t involved killing or being killed in wars we shouldn’t be fighting.

It might seem contradictory, then, that CODEPINK was an enthusiastic supporter of the rights for gays and lesbians to join and serve openly in the military…

We understand that allowing gay soldiers to openly serve in the military is a crack in the armor of bigotry…

We also understand the potential for a powerful alliance between the gay and anti-war communities. We can work together to help young people — gay and straight — find careers that won’t kill them, maim them, destroy them psychologically, or cause them to do harm to others. We can jointly reach out to those already in the military to speak out against the violations of the rights of peoples whose land we occupy. We can ask gay veterans to join groups like Veterans for Peace and Iraq Veterans Against the War. And we can work together to turn our military from an aggressive force to one that truly defends us here at home.

The knife has been pulled out six inches.  Now, let’s work together on the difficult task of pulling it out completely, getting the patient to the emergency room, treating the wound, and stitching it up.  Stopping the military industrial complex’s steamrolling of this nation, and many other nations, means no one of any sexual orientation would have to die for wars that serve no purpose but to save face for politicians and increase corporate profits.

Posted in Anti-war, LGBT rights

NSA surveillance

Legacy PC database migration to Windows / cloud

Also, data conversion, business websites.Bomoco.com.

Categories

Archives

Contact

bob@polizeros.com

310.600.5237