Archive for the 'drought' Category


Expert. Australia drought may be permanent

Dried up river

It may be time to stop describing south-eastern Australia as gripped by drought and instead accept the extreme dry as permanent, one of the nation’s most senior weather experts warned yesterday.

“There is absolutely no debate that Australia is warming,” said Dr Jones. “It is very easy to see … it is happening before our eyes.”

The only uncertainty now was whether the changing pattern was “85 per cent, 95 per cent or 100 per cent the result of the enhanced greenhouse effect”.

So what happens when areas with populations of many million like southeastern Australia become permanently dry? After a few years will there be a population exodus? Certainly people will learn ways to save and reuse water plus there will be an explosion of new technology to aid in doing this. Certain business sectors will shut down while others will be created. This translates into economic dislocation.

Where southeast Australia is now, the American Southwest could be soon. Is there any other heavily populated westernized area facing such an extreme water shortage? They are in uncharted territory, seems to me, and what they do may serve as a model for other increasingly dry areas to follow.

No Comments »

Boat loading ramp. Lake Lanier GA

Lake Lanier boat ramp

Environmental Economics shows us how severe the drought is in Georgia.

No Comments »

Security implications of global climate change

Age of Consequences

In August 2007, a Russian adventurer descended 4,300 meters under the thinning ice of th North Pole to plant a titanium flag, claiming some 1.2 million square kilometers of the Arctic for mother Russia. Not to be outdone, the Prime Minister of Canada stated his intention to boost his nation’s military presence in the Arctic, with the stakes raised by the recent discovery that the icy Northwest Passage has become navigable for the first time in recorded history. Across the globe, the spreading desertification in the Darfur region has been compounding the tensions between nomadic herders and agrarian farmers, providing the environmental backdrop for genocide. In Bangladesh, one of the most densely populated countries in the world, the risk of coastal flooding is growing and could leave some 30 million people searching for higher ground in a nation already plagued by political violence and a growing trend toward Islamist extremism. Neighboring India is already building a wall along its border with Bangladesh. More hopefully, the award of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize to Vice President Al Gore and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is a clear recognition that global warming poses not only environmental hazards but profound risks to planetary peace and stability as well.

2 Comments »

Water shortages on Rio Grande

rio grande

The Rio Grande has no excess water left to give, so border cities are looking at desalination.

“The Rio Grande is one of the most stressed river basins in the world and water use is already at its limit,” said Casey Walsh, a water specialist.

El Paso, some experts say, could run out of water by 20 10. Think about that, a major city with no water. So, El Paso has built an innovative inland desalination plant that processes brackish ground water into 25 millions gallons per day of drinking water while Mexico may channel the river into pipes to prevent loss from seepage and evaporation.

California might want to do this too, as the all-important California Aqueduct flows through desert areas in open channels where water loss must be substantial.

Will technology be able to provide water fixes for increasingly drought-stricken areas? The inescapable fact is that, for many areas, there is too little water and too many people.

No Comments »

Drought in China

drought

Nearly one million people lack drinking water in a southern Chinese province that is suffering its worst water shortage in more than 50 years due to insufficient rain.

The hidden cause of many water shortages, whether they be in China or Atlanta, is the increased population size. 50 years ago such droughts probably would have been a minor annoyance because there simply weren’t that many people in the areas.

If such shortages go too long, especially in urban areas, the potential for political unrest is obvious.

1 Comment »

How not to manage a drought situation

Atlanta is in a severe drought, yet a Pepsi plant in Atlanta slurps up 70.8 million gallons a month while a Dasani plant in Marietta uses 8.4 million gallons a month to produce bottled water - which residents are being told to stockpile in case the drought gets worse!

And, the more water these big users uses, the less they pay per unit.

“We have to ask ourselves,” says Allen Hershkowitz, senior scientist at the Natural Resources Defense Council, “is it fair to subsidize a company with public water supplies that they then turn around and market, at a time when those public water supplies are at crisis levels?”

Indeed.

No Comments »

What happens when the water is gone?

drought

Within our lifetimes, much of the west coast will be uninhabitable desert.

That’s because the spring snowpack in the Rockies is expected to be gone by 2040. And that’s where much of the water for the American southwest comes from.

Read more

2 Comments »

Cokes, nukes, and droughts

With a Coca-Cola plant in Atlanta sucking up huge amounts of water and a nuclear reactor and coal power plant down the river doing the same, the southeast faces major problems because of the drought. How do you cut back? Why if the unthinkable happens and the drought becomes semi-permanent? Celcias asks this and more in a long post wondering, is the world ready to deal with global-warming induced drought?

Atlanta Water Shortage
gives you on the ground coverage.

Yet a suburban Atlanta county has no water problem. That’s because they capture storm water runoff and reclaim wastewater.

No Comments »

As the world burns

There are droughts worldwide now, with the US southwest and southeast suffering badly from them. TomDispatch has a long, thoughtful post about this asking, what happens if water really does run out somewhere? And doesn’t come back?

2 Comments »

Brisbane cuts water uses 47%

In the face of serious drought, Brisbane residents have cut water use nearly in half. Dave Riley, who lives there, says let’s use this as a model for all resource management, for power consumption, recycling, and garbage. Then expand further to include public transportation and, of course, climate change.

Brisbane’s major advantage is that exercises like the water one can work because it is the largest municipality in Australia. So the scale to fiddle was already there and while I’m not advocating council amalgamations as a standard, the fact that the city could intervene at a large level of demographics suggests what could be done at state and federal level if the will, method and guts were in there to harness.

No Comments »

U.S. drought portal

In a real sign of the times, the US government has started a drought portal, with current stats, predictions, and more.

No Comments »

Tennessee town has run out of water

The volunteer fire chief of Orme Tenn. wakes up at 5:30 am three days a week and makes a dozen round trips to a fire hydrant in Alabama, filling a fire truck with water, and bringing it back. At 6 pm the mayor turns on the water for the town’s 145 residents for three hours. That’s all they get. The town has run out of water. All water is being trucked in.

They’ve received emergency federal funds to build a pipeline from Alabama, which might be completed by Thanksgiving.

[The mayor] says the crisis in Orme could serve as a warning to other communities to conserve water before it’s too late.

“I feel for the folks in Atlanta,” he says, his gravelly voice barely rising above the sound of rushing water from the town’s tank. “We can survive. We’re 145 people. You’ve got 4.5 million people down there. What are they going to do? It’s a scary thought.”

If the drought doesn’t break, we may find out. Yikes.

The US Drought Monitor map for Tennessee shows the recent rains definitely helped some, but that 50.4% of that state is still in “extreme” or “exceptional” (the worst category) drought.

No Comments »

Town in San Diego has no water left

Firefighters drained the Ramona reservoir to fight the fire. Now there’s no water left and little possibility, considering the ongoing serious drought, that it will be replenished any time soon. What happens to a town of thousands when there’s no water?

Another serious problem the fire burn areas will face once the fires are out and the rains return will be mudslides, as the denuded hillsides will have no vegetation left to hold the soil in place.

1 Comment »

California has enough water

The trick is to conserve the valuable state resource, make wise decisions about how to use it and cut waste.

Here’s how:

Conservation. (Drought-tolerant plants. Metering. Smart watering systems.)

Store groundwater more efficiently. (Especially during years with surpluses)

Reuse wastewater (Right now, it all flows into the ocean. Use it for irrigation, industry, let it seep into aquifers) )

Stop throwing away storm water. (Build parks and storage areas and let it seep into the soil.)

Cut agricultural water use. (Israel has already done this. Step One. Eliminate subsidies of marginal water-hungry crops.)

Tip: Western Water Blog

1 Comment »

The future is drying up

The perfect drought. NY Times magazine

Thoughts and quotes from the superb New York Times magazine feature story on drought in the southwest.

The problem

Lake Mead, the enormous reservoir in Arizona and Nevada that supplies nearly all the water for Las Vegas, is half-empty, and statistical models indicate that it will never be full again.

“As we move forward all water-management actions based on ‘normal’ as defined by the 20th century will increasingly turn out to be bad bets.”

Every available gallon of the Colorado River has been appropriated by farmers, industries and municipalities. And yet, the region’s population is expected to keep booming.

When I asked if the drought in his models would be permanent, he pondered the question for a moment, then replied: “You can’t call it a drought anymore, because it’s going over to a drier climate. No one says the Sahara is in drought.”

The real problem is the growing population and decreasing water supplies. Every drop has already been appropriated. But the snowmelt is lessening, and that means less water. You’ve heard of Peak Oil. We could be looking at Peak Water in the southwest - and the peak may have already occurred.

Possible solutions

Aurora CO plans to continually reuse water by pumping treated water into the South Platte river, then pumping it out miles downstream, purifying it again, and reusing it.

In the future, wastewater will have to be recycled and reused, so let’s all get used to it.

Treated wastewater isn’t a liability, it’s an asset.” We don’t need potable water to flush our toilets or water our lawns. “One might say that’s a ridiculous use of potable water. In fact, I might say that. But that’s the way we’ve set it up. And that’s going to change, that’s got to change, in this century.”

Las Vegas, ground zero for southwest water problems.

From Pat Mulroy, head of the Southern Nevada Water Authority.

“We have an exploding human population, and we have a shrinking clean-water supply. Those are on colliding paths. This is not just a Las Vegas issue. This is a microcosm of a much larger issue.”

I got the feeling that for Mulroy it means that every blade of grass in her state would soon be gone.

Presumably that will include golf courses. Any golf course in a southwest desert needs to be shut down. Period.

Mulroy has been jawboning, breaking up water accords made in the 1920’s in favor of newer ones that get Vegas more water, something every other city and town in the southwest wants to do with their water supply too.

Water shortages and global warming

The two problems — water and energy — are so intimately linked as to make it exceedingly difficult to tackle one without the other. It isn’t just the matter of growing corn for ethanol, which is already straining water supplies. The less water in our rivers, for instance, the less hydropower our dams produce. The further the water tables sink, the more power it takes to pump water up. The more we depend on coal and nuclear power plants, which require huge amounts of water for cooling, the larger the burden we place on supplies.

Should millions of people even live in deserts? If, because of crisis, water gets diverted from agriculture to humans, then there will be less food for all. What then? Clearly, these problems can not be solved on a local or even state-wide basis. The solutions will have to come from regional alliances and agreements where all the stakeholders have a say in what happens. the only alternative to a morass of lawsuits, turf wars, and nasty fights.

11 Comments »

Dealing with drought

Reduced snowpack due to global warming may prove a bigger problem than rising oceans. But if we get past the Yuck Factor, then water can be reprocessed, saving enormous amounts of money and water as well. Perhaps we will have little choice in the matter.

California and Atlanta are now simultaneously in severe drought while apparently doing their best to do nothing. California has competing ballot propositions that appear to be headed towards a fine train wreck indeed while Atlanta has mad schemes to divert water from other states or maybe build desalinization plants. Um, they do know the clock is ticking on this, right?

Georgia is now threatening to sue the Army Corps of Engineers for diverting water from Lake Lanier to Florida to save endangered species like mussels. All of which is a swell issue for their governor to hyperventiliate about - why is the government saving mussels not people. Except it’s not really true. That downstream water in Florida is also used by a coal plant, nuclear plant, and businesses as well. Nor can Georgia sue the Army Corps, as it’s a federal agency and thus immune from lawsuit, something the governor has to know. The Corps has been responding with bland reassurances that all will be fine and comes across as more than a little patronizing, something which certainly (and rightfully) would honk off the locals. So, this is the beginnings of what could be ongoing water wars in the South; states against states, states against the federal government, juggling business interests with environmental causes.

Also, and this is certainly true in California, saving a species may also mean saving the water. A judge in California recently ordered that less water be diverted to southern California because of an endangered fish in the Sacramento Delta. The reasoning here, and it seems to have been accepted by all, is if that species of fish dies off, then the water itself will have become degraded. Perhaps that’s also true with the Florida mussels.

Here in Connecticut, we have a moderate drought going on. It’s the middle of October, and it was freaking 77 degrees yesterday. This is not normal. The weather is changing. And yes, the State of Connecticut is equally slow about getting proactive about water. Sure, we’re blessed with an abundance of water here, but the drought shows it’s best not to take such things for granted. Maybe that’s the problem, everyone is thinking this drought is a blip that will go away soon, then we get back to normal. But maybe “normal” as it relates to water will need to be redefined - and soon.

No Comments »

Watering fake grass during extreme drought

Yup, that’s what they’re doing in North Carolina…

BTW, the greenest states are also the most liberal - no big surprise there, if you think about it.

1 Comment »

Let them drink Gatorade

After Gutenberg has a fine rant about the extremely serious southeast drought, and how water shortages are at least partly a result of global warming and deforestation.

How bad is the drought? Bad enough they hoped hurricanes would come. And it’s getting worse every day.

Lake Lanier has three months of water storage left. Translation for non-Atlantans, “That’s three months before there’s not enough water for more than 3 million… to take showers, flush their toilets and cook. Three months before there’s not enough water in parts of the Chattahoochee River for power plants to make the steam necessary to generate electricity. Three months before part of the river runs dry.”

Goah, maybe it’ll get so bad the city will proactively order Coca-Cola and Pepsi to stop slurping up millions of gallons of water to make sugared drinks. One would think the choice between having drinking water and making Gatorade would be a simple one, but apparently not.

Sue suggests the perfect solution, “Let them drink Gatorade.”

No Comments »

Atlanta mayor begs residents to conserve water

He calls it a drought “of historic magnitude,” saying Lake Lanier, which provides water to one-third of Georgia, has only enough water for 121 days.

All outdoor watering has been banned. Forecasts says the drought, which is getting worse, will persist in much of the South until December.

Current U.S. drought monitor map. All of southern California and large parts of the South are classified as D-3 “extreme” or D-4 exceptional” droughts, D-4 being the most severe.

Here in Connecticut, we have a D-1 “moderate” drought. However it just started raining again, we got an inch these past few days, and more is coming this week. So our drought may be ending.

No Comments »

Court mandates Southern California water cutbacks

California Aqueduct

This on top of the extreme drought, already in its eighth year. The cutbacks in water supply to southern California from the Sacramento Delta were ordered by U.S. District Judge Oliver W. Wange to protect smelt, a species of fish. The cutbacks could be up to 30% and the City of Long Beach has already imposed limits on water usage. Other cities will undoubtedly do the same.

It’s not just about fish, it’s about the quality of the water.

Obviously it would be very tragic to lose our first native California fish species. But this also has some pretty severe implications for our water supply and just also for the state of the delta itself. You know, whether it’s going to be a functioning ecosystem or whether it’s going to be a polluted backwater with poor water quality.

In other words, the smelt is the canary in the coal mine! Lose it, you may lose a potable water supply too.

Reactions from politicians and media has been, um, instructive. Some yelp about how the dadgummed guvmint should stay out of our affairs. Maybe they want to go thirsty instead? The State legislature is crafting a new water rescue plan that while it includes funds for badly needed maintenance of the aging water infrastructure, is conspicuous by NOT mentioning, much less mandating, conservation. The simple fact is - people and businesses need to use less water, something that with a little planning, need not be problematic.

Lordy, much of southern California is semi-arid or desert. Yet people insist upon having lush green lawns with a swimming pool and golf courses nearby. Palm Springs, where it routinely gets to be 115 in the summer, has dozens of golf courses. This is psychotic, as is the current practice of importing huge amounts of water to grow rice and cotton in the semi-arid California Central Valley. What are they thinking? That water is a resource that can be plundered endlessly for short-term profit? Apparently.

If governments can’t mandate cutbacks and conservation, and if the people won’t do it, then Mother Nature will do it for them.

60% of SoCal water comes from the Sacramento Delta, is piped across deserts in open channels (hello evaporation) then up a mountain and down into L.A. This clearly is not sustainable on a long-term basis.

Water use in California consumes significant amounts of electrical energy. Preliminary estimates indicate that total energy used to pump and treat this water exceeds 15,000 GWh per year, or at least 6.5 percent of the total electricity used in the State per year.

Water use results in such large energy costs primarily because so much of the State’s water demand is located far from available sources, and the moving of water is inherently energy intensive.

Southern California is hardly alone on this. Las Vegas, Phoenix, Tuscon, and many other cities are facing serious water problems which are only being made worse by the severity and length of the drought. But Southern California has, what, 15 million people.

“In the long-term - the long-term meaning two, three, five years - the lifestyle we have will not be able to be sustained,” Van Gelder [general manager of the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District] said.

“We would end up looking more like the semi-arid desert that we are.”

1 Comment »

‘Perfect drought’ in southern California

cactusdrought-sm.jpg

Experts across [Los Angeles] concur that the conditions are ripe in southern California for the “perfect drought“. Los Angeles has recorded just 3.21 in. of rain in the year ending June 30, making it the driest year on record since 1877. According to the National Drought Mitigation Centre, southern California faces “extreme drought” this year, with no rain forecast before September.

Hmm, the “rainy season’ in L.A. can start in September, but generally starts much later, like in December or January. This is when it *can* rain, but there is no guarantee that it will rain. And often it doesn’t.

One climatologist referred to the temperatures in Los Angeles as “Death Valley numbers”.

This means temperatures above 110 (43 C) will be common in the hotter areas. Last summer, when we lived in the San Fernando Valley area of L.A., we had an unprecedented 60 days in a row over 90, 19 days in a row over 100, and it peaked out at 119. This summer looks to be even hotter there, and the heat was certainly one of the reasons we moved to Connecticut. Climate change is happening. (Now we live in an area with ample rain, where 95 degrees is considered a blistering heat wave. We also get water from a well, something that is quite common here.)

“It’s disgusting that Los Angeles parks and golf courses are being irrigated with potable water,” says Nahai [president of the board of the city's water and power commissioners]. “We have to re-educate people about living here.”

‘Disgusting’ it certainly is. ‘Criminally irresponsible’ also comes to mind.

The only local water supply in L.A. is the San Fernando Valley aquifer, which was declared a Superfund site in 1986. All other water comes from hundreds of miles away, from the Colorado River and the Sacramento Delta. A major well in the Valley aquifer has recently been shut down due to chromium 6 contamination which was probably caused by Lockheed Martin (who say they did no differently than any other company back then, and sadly, this is probably true.) If the contamination spreads, the entire aquifer could be poisoned. Not surprisingly, EPA has been asleep at the wheel, say city officials off the record.

In yet another case of a contaminated aquifer, multiple water wells in Santa Monica CA have been shut since 1996 due to MTBE contamination by oil companies. Are degraded water supplies polluted by private enterprise part of the ‘magic of capitalism’ that neocons are always wheezing about? If so, then let them drink the toxic water.

Water used for golf course irrigation in L.A. is not reclaimed. Except for the endangered Valley aquifer, there is no water storage of any consequence in L.A. Water used for irrigation does not trickle down into aquifers to then be pumped up and reused. Nor are there any reservoirs. Instead such water ends up in the ocean or in polluted aquifers.

So, how does a major metro area like southern California, with a population close to 20 million, cope with the likely coming prospect of permanent drought and much less water?

One thing for sure, it will require governments that are not beholden to private enterprise to mandate and enforce the needed changes.

3 Comments »

How insane are the water laws in the US southwest?

This insane. In Colorado it is illegal to collect rainwater flowing off your roof into a rain barrel because under their bizarre and arcane water laws, that water already belongs to someone else - something which takes the concept of private property to entirely new levels of psychosis.

However it’s not just Colorado, all the states in the southwest have equally screwy laws. Upstream rights. Got-here-first rights. Use it or lose it threats. It’s a ball of confusion, yes it is.

Now factor in the huge population growth there, coupled with increasing drought, pitting states against states, cities against agriculture, and you might have some idea of the train wreck that is coming.

PS I’m guessing the American Rainwater Catchment Systems Association will not be having their conference in Colorado…

5 Comments »

Drought lowers electricity generation in Australia

Not only do their power plants use water for cooling, some of the power is from hydro. So it’s a double whammy. The price of electricity is rising fast, and the drought continues.

Solar, wind, and wave power, anyone?

4 Comments »

First thing we do, we kill all the golf courses

The Florida drought has gotten so severe that golf courses are now mandated to use 45% less water - so now they are forced, forced I tell you, to cut back to a mere two million gallons a month each.

Crops are dying but golf courses are allowed to be water pigs so an elite few can continue their blatantly anti-environmental, privileged lifestyle?

What better symbol can there be for the selfishness of a few and the rapacity of capitalism than golf courses being permitted to use huge amounts of water during a severe drought so a few can get wealthier while catering to the elite.

6 Comments »

Australia drought and saving water

Dave Riley blogs on the continuing serious drought in Queensland, Australia, saying that undoubtedly needed water conservation measures are having unintended consequences. The government is now mandating that 10% of sewage water be treated then used as drinking water. But this adds all manner of chemicals to the water, and if water usage is down due to conservation, then less of that is available to go back into the supply. Thus, the concentration of the chemicals will rise. He thinks the chemicals will cause fish kills too.

Also, with everyone building water tanks and storing as much water as possible, he asks, “what are we then supposed to do, ‘individually’, with the water?

Another problem is that reduced water usage means less water flowing into septic tanks, with the result that they stop working correctly.

So, I’m saying peoples: things ain’t as easy as they seem no matter what baloney is proffered as a solution.

Often, conservation (and recycling) programs are aimed at the end user, the consumer. Like it’s all supposed to be their responsibility. But that’s hardly a solution. The answers have to come from all levels of the production chain, from manufacturers and agriculture too, not just consumers. In the Central Valley of California, water is brought in from hundreds of miles away at subsidized rates to irrigate water-hungry crops in a semi-arid area simply because the soil is fertile. Growing crops unsuited for semi-arid areas using imported water is something that can not last long-term nor is it sustainable.

California better pay attention to what’s happening in Australia now. As should we all. Conservation and intelligent use of resources need to be implemented at all levels of the (literal) food chain.

4 Comments »