Socialism and Stalin
Bob Morris @ Jan 28th 2008 07:40 - Category: Socialism
Squirrel Communism looks at the horrors of Stalinism and the sometimes tendency of the socialist left to say this occurred outside of or was a perversion of the revolution.
If we are to deal with this problem and eventually overcome it, we shall have to go beyond calls for a “return to Lenin” and a rejection of “Stalinism”. We must accept Stalinism as a historical part of our movement, its horrors as our horrors. Only then will we actually try to find some real solution to our (get it?) contradictions and give capital a final kick in the butt.
A primary force leading to such horrors is the dictatorship of the proletariat. In theory it is supposed to be aimed only at the recently deposed bourgeoisie, and a temporary situation as well. In practice, it becomes an entrenched system run by a few with vast powers and no way to replace them.
1 Comment »
One Response to “Socialism and Stalin”
Leave a Reply
Comments subject to deletion at whim of capricious webmaster. Disagreements are ok. Flames, trolls, and right-wing attacks are not. If your comment doesn't appear immediately, then moderation is on, thus there's no need to re-send it.
(However sometimes the anti-spam programs here go awry. Email us if your comments seem to vanish into the void.)
paradoctor on 29 Jan 2008 at 2:06 am #
Consider the so-called individualism of the capitalists, and the so-called collectivism of the socialists. To the extent that the capitalists really are for self-organizing markets, then they favor a system that is by definition one of collective mass action; and to the extent that socialists really are for centralization, then they by definition favor giving control of the economy to a small number of individuals. So the ‘individualists’ want a mass collective in control, and the ‘collectivists’ want a few individuals in control. That’s the contradiction.