Lenin’s Tomb gets grumpy
Bob Morris @ Jun 8th 2006 11:44 - Category: Unfiled
It’s probably mere pedantry on my part, but the US were suggesting that Zarqawi was their most dangerous opponent in Iraq even when according to their figures his organisation was responsible for a measly six out of three thousands attacks.
And while Zarqawi may well be dead, hasn’t he been reported dead several times before too?
1 Comment »
One Response to “Lenin’s Tomb gets grumpy”
Leave a Reply
Comments subject to deletion at whim of capricious webmaster. Disagreements are ok. Flames, trolls, and right-wing attacks are not. If your comment doesn't appear immediately, then moderation is on, thus there's no need to re-send it.
(However sometimes the anti-spam programs here go awry. Email us if your comments seem to vanish into the void.)
Joe Hartley on 08 Jun 2006 at 8:05 pm #
So he’s dead. So what? The major resistance has been from non-jihadist Sunnis fearful of losing their power and former Ba’athist army groups who melted away (along with their expertise, weaponry, and 250 million tons of ammo and weapons) into the population.
Dubya will strut around for a few days until the Ba’athist blow up the American embassy, or something equally spectacular. I’m surprised he didn’t wait until October to do this. That’s the Rove way.