FBI explanation about shooting Ibragim Todashev keeps changing


Official explanations of why Boston Bombing suspect friend Ibragim Todashev was shot have changed multiple times and none of them make sense. We need an independent investigation to determine what actually happened.

It is difficult to understand how, having shot the man dead, the multiple law enforcement personnel on scene could’ve gotten the details wrong. Discrepancies can creep into an account of a stressful situation. But how can there possibly be confusion about whether the suspect was a) wielding a knife, per the original story; b) unarmed, per subsequent versions; c) or lunging with or toward a samurai sword? We’re supposed to believe that multiple law enforcement personnel went to a man’s apartment, confirmed via his own confession that he participated in a triple murder with an alleged terrorist, and still left him within reach of a samurai sword?