Rebranding global warming, it’s ‘global climate disruption’ now

White House science adviser John Holdren proposed the phrase. Conservatives have been mocking it, “Trips off the tongue, doesn’t it?” This new term sounds deliberately ominous, and that smells of spin to me. What’s wrong with ‘climate change.” Besides, in some areas, climate change will be beneficial, as in more rain and better crops. So why not acknowledge that?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.