How to deal with unsolicited email
Bob Morris @ Oct 30th 2007 17:08 - Category: Unfiled
Chris Anderson, The editor of Wired, tired of getting hundreds of unsolicited emails a day from PR firms, has retaliated in a suitably fitting manner. First, he put all their emails in his blocked list.
There is no getting off this list. If you’re on it and have something appropriate to say to me, use a different email address.
Second, and this is the sweet part, he printed all their email addresses on his blog.
If their address gets harvested by spammers by being published here, so be it–turnabout is fair play.
Tip: The Big Picture
5 Comments »
5 Responses to “How to deal with unsolicited email”
Leave a Reply
Comments subject to deletion at whim of capricious webmaster. Disagreements are ok. Flames, trolls, and right-wing attacks are not. If your comment doesn't appear immediately, then moderation is on, thus there's no need to re-send it.
(However sometimes the anti-spam programs here go awry. Email us if your comments seem to vanish into the void.)
Eli Stephens on 30 Oct 2007 at 10:40 pm #
The problem is so much spam comes from either non-existent email addresses, or, worse, from real email addresses which have been spoofed and who have nothing to do with it. The amount of spam coming from a real, repliable email address is close to zero.
DJ on 31 Oct 2007 at 10:08 am #
I do get quite a bit from legitimate companies who got my email address from a business group I used to be in– and who just won’t take my name off their lists, no matter how often I unsubscribe. I think this is a great idea.
woody on 31 Oct 2007 at 1:51 pm #
This is a bad idea… One of the most recent tricks spammers have been using is “double binding” their new lists with old lists. They make the to address from recently aquired lists, and the from address from old lists they’ve used before. The result?
If the mail goes through, they’re more likely to get through the spam filters because it’s “from” a legit address. If it bounces, the “from” target gets their spam in the form of a “send failed” message, which often passes through spam filters. Either way, they get their message to more people than just by blind mailing alone.
So what happens now if someone used such a technique against this CEO? He’s listing hundreds of e-mails for people that are already spam victoms so they can get more? Hardly seems fair.
Now if they were smart, they’d used the headers to figure out where the mail originated and block off anything originating from those servers. You’d see a lot of the spammer’s ISPs quickly start cracking down if this happened and suddenly their server was being black listed. It would also help distribute the load, as each ISP would have to deal with its customers, vs putting it all on the receiver to try to fix the problem with filters.
Bob Morris on 01 Nov 2007 at 6:33 pm #
GMail and many other mail programs have good kill filters.
Tracking the ISPs can help, assuming it;s not just spambots sending the email and that the ISP isn’t in on it.
I get spam comments here with identical text sent to multiple posts from widely different IP addresses. These are sent by bots.
DJ on 01 Nov 2007 at 7:13 pm #
The problem with blocking originating servers is that much of the spam I get appears to originate from Hotmail. (I’m sure this server info is somehow spoofed.) If I block Hotmail, I won’t be able to receive email from my friends who use it.
I too have the problem of identical trackbacks originating from a variety of apparent sources. I suspect email is the same.