Archive for April 27th, 2006


Wireless

So I’m in the hotel lobby trying to get on the Net because the server the wireless in the room connects to wasn’t responding.

A techy-looking guy walks past, sees the PC, says I can’t get online, can you? Not in the rooms, I’m trying here, the lobby is a different net. He says, all I get is blank screens, I’m going outside to the parking lot where it’s cooler and I can scream.

Another Nethead. Addicted aren’t we?

PS I called tech support, told them their server was dead, and to their credit, an hour later, the room wireless was working. And that’s where this is coming from.

1 Comment »

Sen. Goofball

Just heard some senator on NPR saying, because of gas prices, he was backing a $100 refund check to American drivers - and that this proves that “Congress gets it.”

It was the best laugh Sue and I had all day. I wonder, what planet is Congress from?

2 Comments »

Connection spotty

We’re at a convention these next few days. The wireless isn’t working inthe room but is working in the lobby. So, blogging may (or may not) be haphazard the next few days. Depends if they fix their network or not.

No Comments »

Nepal Maoists announce cease-fire

The Maoists were clear that the cease-fire is for three months only and “with the intention to encourage the political parties to announce an unconditional special assembly.”

The rebels are for now “being flexible in order to trust the parties” to help overthrow the king, Yadav said. “If anyone goes against the people, their downfall is inevitable, whether it is the political parties or the monarchy or any force.”

Note they specifically say the King and monarchy must go.

[tags]nepal[/tags]

1 Comment »

The theftocracy continues

ExxonMobil’s Q1 profit rises seven per cent to $8.4 billion.

The corner station here in L.A., $3.19 for self-serve regular.

Danzinger

No Comments »

Day Without a Gringo

The meme spreads - frontpage LA Times, on the spread of the May 1 boycott to Mexico and Latin America.

In Ciudad Juarez, across the border from El Paso, the Chamber of Commerce announced that its 5,000 members would neither buy nor sell U.S. products that day. And leaders of a Chihuahua state peasant group said they planned to block the bridges that link Ciudad Juarez and El Paso.

In Guatemala, activists who work with Maya Indians are planning to use community radio stations to spread word of the boycott to rural areas.

A commenter here last week said email was circulating Costa Rica about May 1 too.

What’s most amazing about all this, the historic March 25 march in L.A., and now the May 1 boycott, is that it’s coming straight out of the grassroots. Yes, there are organizers, but even they are stunned by the size of this emerging immigrant rights movement. While the chattering classes and Netizens look for guidance from D.C., workers across the country, Latino and non-Latino, undocumented as well as citizen, have marched in the streets by the literal millions. You bet it’s gotten the attention of D.C. And it’s come from the working class.

No Comments »

The coming Iran War, pt. 1

Global Guerillas on the coming US attack on Iran

Despite the seeming inevitability of this path, the outcomes (”effects”) it would produce are far from inevitable. An attack of this type would be a global system shock that is rife with downside risks and uncertainties. Once the attack commences, the shock waves it produces would be far-reaching, unpredictable, and in most cases very bad. Even if the U.S. military is prepared to repel an Iranian counter-attack and armed revolts from Iraqi Shiite militia members, it’s impossible to prevent rocketing oil prices, global terrorist attacks, and severe diplomatic fall-out. Further, Iran’s government may prove to be more resourceful than anticipated and outlast the attack, only to resume production of nuclear materials with the intent of revenge. Worse yet, the US might inadvertently collapse the US-led post cold war environment as countries, distrustful of US intentions, scramble to safety amid rapidly gyrating economic and social instability.

Despite these well-founded fears, the lack of other viable options coupled with the pertinacious intent of the U.S. administration to stop Iran from building the bomb (heedless of the costs), will likely drive the Pentagon towards this method of attack. To the Bush administration, all alternatives are preferable to a nuclear-armed Iranian clerical regime with de facto control over Palestine’s Hamas, Shiite militias in Iraq, Lebanon’s Hezbollah and numerous other global terror groups. For those contemplating this attack, the Iranian regime, with Ahmadinejad as its public face, has become everything that Saddam promised to be and more.

A far saner solution is voiced by former US Senator James Abourezk, “To end terrorism, end illegal occupations.”

John Robb, who is most of Global Guerillas, tends to be accurate about what’s coming. His expertise is in what he calls open source warfare, networked organizations engaged in asymmetrical warfare against traditional militaries. I’ve no idea what his politics are, he never expresses them. Interesting guy.

1 Comment »

The coming Iran War, pt. 2

A country that fears small, distant countries to such an extent that it utilizes military in place of diplomatic means is not a superpower. The entire world knows that the US is not a superpower when its entire available military force is tied down by a small lightly armed insurgency drawn from a Sunni population of a mere 5 million people.

Neoconservatives think the US is a superpower because of its military weapons and nuclear missiles. However, as the Iraqi resistance has demonstrated, America’s superior military firepower is not enough to prevail in fourth generation warfare. The Bush regime has reached this conclusion itself, which is why it increasing speaks of attacking Iran with nuclear weapons.

The US is the only country to have used nuclear weapons against an opponent. If six decades after nuking Japan the US again resorts to the use of nuclear weapons, it will establish itself as a pariah, war criminal state under the control of insane people. Any sympathy that might still exist for the US would immediately disappear, and the world would unite against America.

A country against which the world is united is not a superpower.

Paul Craig Roberts. Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration. Former Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal editorial page and Contributing Editor of National Review.

Why is no one in Congress saying this? Will they again sit back, do nothing, and allow another war to begin? The consequences of attacking Iran will be a global conflagration, yet in D.C., both parties are doing nothing to stop it from happening. This is amorality of the worst kind. At least the neocons tell you where they stand, unlike the Democrats, who mouth platitudes about peace, then vote for war.

The people can stop the Iran war. Congress can not and will not.

2 Comments »

Experts: Global warming causes hurricanes

The record Atlantic hurricane season last year can be attributed to global warming, several top experts, including a leading U.S. government storm researcher, said on Monday.

“The hurricanes we are seeing are indeed a direct result of climate change, and it’s no longer something we’ll see in the future; it’s happening now,” said Greg Holland, a division director at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo.

No Comments »