NY Times on Wikipedia

Anonymous Source Is Not the Same as Open Source

Can an article be judged as credible without knowing its author?

Wikipedia says yes, but I am unconvinced.

1 Comment »

One Response to “NY Times on Wikipedia”

  1. John Couzin on 13 Mar 2006 at 2:46 am #

    I would need some other evidence to convince me. Stories abound of the weird and the wonderful but without something to tie it down it doesn’e amount to much.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply



Comments subject to deletion at whim of capricious webmaster. Disagreements are ok. Flames, trolls, and right-wing attacks are not. If your comment doesn't appear immediately, then moderation is on, thus there's no need to re-send it.

(However sometimes the anti-spam programs here go awry. Email us if your comments seem to vanish into the void.)