September 28, 2008


The proposed bailout plan is a sellout of the American public

Clusterstock has the gory details. Here’s their rundown of two of the most loathsome provisions.

“Preventing Unjust Enrichment”: Treasury can’t pay more for the crap assets than the banks bought them for (a horrifying possibility, given that most of the securities have already been written way down). This provision, however, doesn’t apply to banks who acquired the assets via mergers or to banks in bankruptcy or conservatorship. It also means that the Treasury can and will pay far more than market value for this garbage (and, thus, go against the advice of Warren Buffett and Bill Gross, among others, who recommend paying market prices).

Executive compensation at bailed-out companies. Toothless: The plan ostensibly prohibits golden parachute payments to CEOs and other “C-level” execs at bailed-out companies. However, it really only prevents payments on severance deals that are struck AFTER the bailout.

Congress has now almost completely ignored the will of the people, who are strongly opposed to the plan. They said they would stop the most obnoxious parts of the plan but for the most part have done nothing of the sort except to pretend they have by tossing up a few transparent fig leafs.

No Comments »


Kucinich: “Is this the United States Congress or the Board of Directors of Goldman Sachs?”

Tip: Dealbreaker

For those who may not know, Paulson is a past CEO of Goldman and the government did not deem this a crisis until Goldman stock start getting hammered and was dropping precipitously. It was only then that they swung into full damage control mode.

No Comments »


Emanations from the Ministry of Propaganda

Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) says homelessness is down. Yup, their statistics show that there is less homelessness now not more. What, you think that’s odd, given the slowing economy, that maybe HUD fudged their figures?

Well, you’d be correct. Except it’s more like an entire fudge factory than just one piece of fudge. HUD redefined what is meant to be homeless, thus removing many who had previously been counted.

HUD says they’re doing this to put on a happy face, because if the numbers were big, then people might get all frowny and despondent and not want to help. So, HUD is making the numbers smaller on purpose in hopes that this will motivate people to help. No, I am not making this up.

Of course, given the huge numbers of lies the Bush Adminstration has told over they years, do you suppose maybe that homelessness is actually way up and neocon HUD flacks are deliberately are falsifying the numbers?

1 Comment »


The financial crisis and the bailout


First were subprime mortages. Bankers and the real estate industry were making zillions selling subprime, then pacakaging them into investment vehicles. so, it behooved everyone to pump out as many mortgages as possible because, after all, prices will never fall again.

The mortgages were assembled into CDOs

A CDO is a corporate entity constructed to hold assets as collateral and to sell packages of cash flows to investors.

Then, everyone bought and sold CDS on them. These are a form of insurance, but couldn’t be called insurance because that would be illegal. besides, nothing could ever go wrong, so why worry about defaults.

A credit default swap (CDS) is a credit derivative contract between two counterparties, whereby the “buyer” or “fixed rate payer” pays periodic payments to the “seller” or “floating rate payer” in exchange for the right to a payoff if there is a default.

This means mortgages were packaged into bonds that were sliced and diced by risk levels into CDOs, and then everyone bought and sold pseudo-insurance on them, further fattening their cash flow. Yes, it’s all air, nothing of value that created jobs or companies (except to a tiny few) was accomplished by any of this. The robber barons of a previous era may have been pirates, but at least they created stuff, like railroads, steel companies, the oil industry, etc. These arcane financial instruments created nothing of lasting value.

Unlike stocks that can be bought on the open market, CDOs and CDSs are private, unregulated transactions. Their notational amount is in the many, many trillions. All manner of banks, pensions funds, etc. hold them.

Everyone partied for a long time of this, making enormous profits. The functioning of these markets depended primarily on two things, 1) real estate had to keep going up in value. 2) Since most these debt instruments were funded by borrowing cheap short-term money and “investing” it long-term, it was essential that the spigot of cheap short-term money continue. Alan “Greed is Good because Ayn Rand said so” made sure this was true for a long time.

However, the inevitable happened, housing prices fell and the cheap money went away. Hence the debt instruments tanked in value. But, unlike a listed stock, you can’t just sell them. In many cases, there are no buyers.

That’s when the financial markets began to lock up. Worse, everything is interlocked. Lehman goes bankrupt. How many CDSs do they have that they can no longer make good on? Will, say, a bank in Britain or a pension fund in Florida suffer big losses because of this? The point is that the shadow banking system, as it is called, is so murky and opaque, that no one knows how many icebergs are out there waiting to sink financial ships or even where they are.

Right now, credit markets are frozen. Hedge funds are facing massive redemptions and are dumping whatever they can. Lots of normal businesses that routinely borrow short-term money to make payroll then repay quickly out of A/R are finding interest rates are much higher or the money just isn’t available. So, this is having serious, real-world effects.

Jason Calacanis, who founded weblogs.com and sold it to AOL, on the current situation (via his listserv)

It’s my believe that the economic downturn will be much worse than it is today, and that 50-80% of the venture-backed startups currently operating will shut down or go on life-support (i.e. 3-4 folks working on them) within the next 18 months.

To conclude - yes, the whole system was insane, unworkable, doomed to fail, based on greed, and too many got wealthy by plundering the system and destroying companies in the process. Yup, that’s all true. And we need to fix things so greedfests like this can’t happen again.

But this isn’t some made up crisis designed to benefit the fat cats. No, it’s a real, looking into the abyss, worldwide financial crisis.

2 Comments »


Sen. Dianne Feinstein on executive compensation for the bailout

This is part of an email response Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) is sending to constituents who contacted her opposing the bailout.

Californians are frosted by the absence of controls on executive compensation. Virtually all of the 50,000 phone calls and letters mentioned this one way or another. There must be limits. I am told that the reason the Treasury Secretary does not want limits on executive compensation is because he believes that an executive then will not bring his company in to partake in any program that is set up. Here is my response to that: We can put that executive on his boat, take that boat out in the ocean, and set it on fire.

This is extraordinarily blunt language for a senator to use.

3 Comments »


AIG bailout saved Goldman from major loss

From Naked Capitalism (and indeed, it doesn’t get much more naked, greedy, and self-serving than this.)

Gretchen Morgenson in the New York Times reports that Goldman and no other Wall Street firm was involved in the AIG rescue talks and an AIG failure would have created a hole as big as $20 billion in Goldman’s balance sheet.

This is special dealing, pure and simple. Even if AIG needed to be salvaged (there was considerable agreement on this point), having Goldman deeply involved in the process is cronyism. But that’s been a staple of this Administration.

Indeed. the government only really got concerned about the crisis when Goldman stock started getting hammered hard and was dropping like a stone. That’s when they intervened.

4 Comments »