Archive for June 29th, 2007


Obama Watch

Obama came out against impeachment for either Bush or Cheney, saying that they’ve done nothing to merit it.

Gee, thanks for that window into your judgment Senator.

Indeed, why anyone thinks Obama is even slightly liberal baffles me. I got fooled by Bill Clinton, won’t get fooled again.

1 Comment »

EC report details devastating climate change consequences

The European Commission has released a draft of a report on the likely consequences of global warming, urging their member nations to act now to protect “power stations, transport systems and agriculture from flooding, droughts, forest fires and landslides.”

More apocalyptically, this report says Europe could be faced with “relocating ports, industry and entire cities and villages from low-lying coastal areas and flood plains.”

“Soft” measures enacted now, like “water conservation, changes in crop rotation and working on wetlands on flood prevention” could prevent “hard” measures from being needed later on. Such hard measures would include “increasing the height of dikes, relocating ports, industry and entire cities and villages from low-lying coastal areas and flood plains, and building new power plants because of failing hydropower stations”

The contrast between Europe, which is actively providing solutions to climate changes, to the do-nothing US Congress, which has lethargically just now decided to create a commission (see next post) to study climate change, is telling. European governments get it. The US government, and this includes both parties, does not, and instead is living in a dream world of unreality.

No Comments »

This train was long overdue

But it’s finally arrived, sort of.

US House passes bill affirming global warming exists.

But rather than, you know, actually do something pro-active about climate change, the esteemed members of the House have instead decided to “establish a new commission to review scientific questions that need to be addressed.”

Golly, it shouldn’t take the commission more than a couple of years to conclude that more study is needed, and goodness, that rash action needs to be avoided as this might impact our all-important and patriotic oil and coal industries.

Meanwhile, countries like Germany and Japan are actively working to combat global warming, rather than establishing pointless commissions.

Why is the US government (both parties included) so willfully and deliberately ignorant about climate change?

No Comments »

‘Perfect drought’ in southern California

cactusdrought-sm.jpg

Experts across [Los Angeles] concur that the conditions are ripe in southern California for the “perfect drought“. Los Angeles has recorded just 3.21 in. of rain in the year ending June 30, making it the driest year on record since 1877. According to the National Drought Mitigation Centre, southern California faces “extreme drought” this year, with no rain forecast before September.

Hmm, the “rainy season’ in L.A. can start in September, but generally starts much later, like in December or January. This is when it *can* rain, but there is no guarantee that it will rain. And often it doesn’t.

One climatologist referred to the temperatures in Los Angeles as “Death Valley numbers”.

This means temperatures above 110 (43 C) will be common in the hotter areas. Last summer, when we lived in the San Fernando Valley area of L.A., we had an unprecedented 60 days in a row over 90, 19 days in a row over 100, and it peaked out at 119. This summer looks to be even hotter there, and the heat was certainly one of the reasons we moved to Connecticut. Climate change is happening. (Now we live in an area with ample rain, where 95 degrees is considered a blistering heat wave. We also get water from a well, something that is quite common here.)

“It’s disgusting that Los Angeles parks and golf courses are being irrigated with potable water,” says Nahai [president of the board of the city's water and power commissioners]. “We have to re-educate people about living here.”

‘Disgusting’ it certainly is. ‘Criminally irresponsible’ also comes to mind.

The only local water supply in L.A. is the San Fernando Valley aquifer, which was declared a Superfund site in 1986. All other water comes from hundreds of miles away, from the Colorado River and the Sacramento Delta. A major well in the Valley aquifer has recently been shut down due to chromium 6 contamination which was probably caused by Lockheed Martin (who say they did no differently than any other company back then, and sadly, this is probably true.) If the contamination spreads, the entire aquifer could be poisoned. Not surprisingly, EPA has been asleep at the wheel, say city officials off the record.

In yet another case of a contaminated aquifer, multiple water wells in Santa Monica CA have been shut since 1996 due to MTBE contamination by oil companies. Are degraded water supplies polluted by private enterprise part of the ‘magic of capitalism’ that neocons are always wheezing about? If so, then let them drink the toxic water.

Water used for golf course irrigation in L.A. is not reclaimed. Except for the endangered Valley aquifer, there is no water storage of any consequence in L.A. Water used for irrigation does not trickle down into aquifers to then be pumped up and reused. Nor are there any reservoirs. Instead such water ends up in the ocean or in polluted aquifers.

So, how does a major metro area like southern California, with a population close to 20 million, cope with the likely coming prospect of permanent drought and much less water?

One thing for sure, it will require governments that are not beholden to private enterprise to mandate and enforce the needed changes.

3 Comments »

How insane are the water laws in the US southwest?

This insane. In Colorado it is illegal to collect rainwater flowing off your roof into a rain barrel because under their bizarre and arcane water laws, that water already belongs to someone else - something which takes the concept of private property to entirely new levels of psychosis.

However it’s not just Colorado, all the states in the southwest have equally screwy laws. Upstream rights. Got-here-first rights. Use it or lose it threats. It’s a ball of confusion, yes it is.

Now factor in the huge population growth there, coupled with increasing drought, pitting states against states, cities against agriculture, and you might have some idea of the train wreck that is coming.

PS I’m guessing the American Rainwater Catchment Systems Association will not be having their conference in Colorado…

5 Comments »