Archive for November 23rd, 2004


King/Drew trauma center in L.A. to close

If you close a trauma center, people will die, there’s really no question about that. And to close a trauma center in a part of L.A. that desperately needs it, no matter how troubled the hospitial. seems criminal to me. Today, the Country Board of Supervisors voted to close it saying it was badly mismanaged and we can’t afford it anyway.


Hospitals all over L.A. have been closing, with more closures are coming. This is one of the more visible closings.


The war in Iraq costs 231 million a day - way more than what’s needed to keep the King/Drew trauma center open for a couple of years and to make the entire hospital solvent as well.

No Comments »

265 million = 4 billion?

That’s what the California Insurance Commissioner apparently thinks, signing onto a deal for Wellpoint that will cost policyholders 4 billion. His price to protect the citizens of California was a paltry 265 million.



WellPoint’s deal with Anthem had been delayed for months by California Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi. The commissioner opposed it citing concerns about the rich bonuses it would bestow upon executives and fears that policyholders would end up paying $4 billion in transaction costs.


Garamendi relented this month when the companies agreed to earmark $265 million for California healthcare programs.


The transfer of wealth from the middle class to the ruling class continues unabated.

No Comments »

Why governments don’t like fuel-efficient cars

Because it means less taxes paid on gasoline. So,, here in California a plan to put tracking devices in cars and charge drivers by the mile is being floated.


What a goofy idea! There are just so many reasons this couldn’t work. For example, the hack to crack such a device would probably be available within, oh, 15 minutes of the device being released. This would prompt an escalating race of California releasing a new device to foil the current crack, followed of course, by a new crack. Plus, the infrastructure for such a crazy idea, data from millions of cars each day being fed to a central computer system for billing seems 1) ponderous at best, 2) open to hacking, 3) expensive to maintain, and 4) <fill in the blanks>



Supporters, whose ranks include academics, urban planners and many transportation leaders, say that the tax on gasoline has not kept up with inflation. The tax has been stuck at 18 cents per gallon in California since 1994, and the additional federal tax is also about 18 cents. And as cars and trucks become more fuel efficient, it could get more difficult to collect enough funds to keep up with road construction costs.


So, rather than take the obvious route of raising the gas tax, which would be politically unpopular, they want track all California drivers. Why sure I want a tracking device in my car. Of course that data would never ever be misused to, say, monitor where antiwars organizer are driving - why that’s just paranoia, isn’t it? Of course it is…

No Comments »

Merry Christmas!

Economic “Armageddon” predicted

No Comments »