Archive for the 'Fair use' Category


Ok, we can link to AP again. Sort of.

AP backed off their threat of a lawsuits against the Drudge Retort (a liberal site) for quoting 40-80 words from their articles. They now say they just want to protect their headlines and the lede from being posted elsewhere. (So does that mean you can quote extensively from the rest of the article without fear of angering grumpy lawyers?)

Several websites with money have promised financial support should this end up in court in a battle over Fair Use. But stakes are high here, a ruling supporting AP could hurt bloggers.

Fair Use doctrine is vague. However too many blogs have the bad habit of quoting large sections of newspaper articles then adding a one sentence response. This is almost certainly not Fair Use and is something I avoid doing here. Besides, why would someone want to read a copy-cat blog with long quotes from elsewhere when they can read the source article instead?

A better alternative is to rephrase what the article said. Then it becomes your post, with your ideas, and Fair Use is no longer an issue.

No Comments »

Fair Use

Erik J. Heels explains clearly and succinctly what Fair Use is.

For blogging, Fair Use would be using maybe a few paragraphs, then adding your own commentary. You can also just re-phrase what the author said (with a link back), then Fair Use no longer applies.

Check our series of posts on Fair Use for detailed explanations. Fair Use also applies to images. Here’s a list of pay and public domain sites for images and graphics.

With a little thought and effort, Fair Use need not be an issue for blog posts. Plus, the less you quote, the more the blog post becomes yours. It then becomes your voice, not the quoted voice, which is what blogging is about anyway.

Tip: The Big Picture

No Comments »

Fair Use. Some thoughts

Since running a series of posts on fair use, I’ve changed my blogging style and rarely directly quote other sources now - and the blog is better for it.

Many blogs routinely quote multiple paragraphs from other sources. While this can make for a quick post, paraphrasing works better, because then what you say becomes your own words and your own thoughts. It makes for better writing and better blogging, with the added benefit that fair use is then no longer an issue.

No Comments »

Fair Use. Points for bloggers

Continuing our series of posts on fair use.

Melanie Votaw, friend, author, and freelance writer, details what bloggers need to know about fair use. (printed with her permission.)

Points for bloggers to remember when using a writer’s work

1. Internet material is not free for use. Too many people, bloggers included, seem to believe that anything on the Internet is free for their use. The law says otherwise. Website copy is not free to be used unless it explicitly says so on that website or you have received explicit permission from the copyright holder. This applies to writing and artwork of all types. And giving credit to the original writer still does not allow you to violate copyright law.

2. Copyright law applies to blogs and other websites. Copyright infringement applies online just as it does in print, including blogs. The Digital Millennium Act signed by President Clinton in 1998 solidified this fact. Copyright law contains no exceptions or exemptions for bloggers or ezine publishers.

3. Understand “fair use.” It’s customary for blogs to take large portions of an article or even an entire article and paste it into the blog, followed by comments. This is blatant copyright infringement. It is NOT “fair use.” While the law’s description of fair use may be somewhat vague, it certainly doesn’t apply to quoting large portions of an article or book. According to the law, there are four factors that go into deciding whether a given use of copyrighted material is considered fair use:

  1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes.
  2. the nature of the copyrighted work.
  3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole.
  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

Fair use allows you to use short quotes or even a paragraph, as long as you credit the original writer. Bloggers should carefully review the fair use guidelines because any blogger who cuts and pastes large sections of an article is setting himself or herself up for a copyright infringement lawsuit (or 2 or 3.) A blogger is vulnerable to lawsuits from individuals as well as corporations who own the rights to the work being used. Since the law is on the side of the copyright holder, a blogger has little hope of winning any such lawsuit.

In order to avoid using large portions of someone else’s work, many bloggers paraphrase the key points of the original work, linking back to the original article. This brings more of you into your blog anyway, allowing you to get your own voice in there, do your own thinking, and make your own connections. It will probably also attract more people to your blog.

You can even use both HREF and TITLE tags so that the article will appear in its own window, which prevents you from sending readers away from your site. Incorporating someone else’s writing on your blog is distracting. Besides, if you are often posting the work of others, you’re not adding what you could to the discussion.

4. Copyright law applies whether or not your blog makes money. Blogging is publishing, whether your blog is non-profit or profit. If you steal a car and resell it, steal it and drive it, steal it and turn it into a taxi, or steal it and donate it to charity, it makes no difference. Theft is theft – it is up to the owner of any property to decide how that property should or should not be used – and this includes intellectual property.

5. It isn’t always the number of words, but the importance of the words. Pay attention to point #4 of the fair use language. A decision in 2000 in the case of Cook v. Robbins found that just a couple of two-word phrases used by Robbins was considered copyright infringement against Cook because those phrases were so important to Cook’s work. While this is rare, fair use can indeed sometimes be tricky. Before quoting a section of text, review the fair use criteria to determine whether you truly believe your article meets them.

Note that quoting 150 words from an article is not the same as quoting 150 words from a poem. In terms of fair use, you always need to think about the length of the original piece and how important the words that you’re using are to the heart of the piece. With short work of a highly creative nature such as poems and song lyrics, the only safe recourse is to get permission.

6. Reprinting articles without permission lessens their market value. This brings us to the freelancer’s point of view. Most bloggers probably have no idea about this, but you could seriously limit the potential market value of an article when you publish substantial portions of it on your blog. If a blog has published a large portion of an article online without permission, another magazine which might pay to republish the article is likely to turn it down because the article has received too much exposure. This robs the copyright holder of potential income.

7. Writers are not flattered when their work is stolen. Some bloggers have argued that a writer should be flattered to have their work picked up by a blog and seen by so many. Using this analogy, a writer should also be flattered that the New York Times wants to publish an article for free.

Bloggers also enjoy the same copyright protection for their original material and should take steps to protect it. The US Copyright office publishes a basic guide to Copyright and fair use. It applies to anyone who wants to use another’s work, and every blogger should have a copy.

8. Copyright law is not behind the times. Bloggers have also argued that the copyright law needs to catch up to technology. The Digital Millennium Act of 1998 belies this argument, but beyond that, violating copyright law on the Internet is actually more serious than in print, since so many more people have access to the material. While large corporations often try to manipulate rights from individuals, you can be sure that these same corporations will not readily give up their intellectual property rights, and they’ll put plenty of money behind maintaining the legislation that protects those rights.

Bloggers simply need to read copyright law for themselves and have an understanding of what truly constitutes fair use. Listening to what your friends believe to be true isn’t good enough and does nothing to protect you from potential lawsuits. As bloggers add more and more of their own content to their blogs, they, too, may find their copyrights infringed. Learn to protect your own work while you protect the work of others.

This information was compiled by several prominent freelance writers (not attorneys) who are members of various professional writers’ organizations, including the Society of Professional Journalists, the American Society of Journalists and Authors, and the Authors Guild.

– Melanie Votaw

4 Comments »

Fair use and blogging, legal

From the US Copyright Office

The distinction between “fair use” and infringement may be unclear and not easily defined. There is no specific number of words, lines, or notes that may safely be taken without permission. Acknowledging the source of the copyrighted material does not substitute for obtaining permission.

The 1961 Report of the Register of Copyrights on the General Revision of the U.S. Copyright Law cites examples of activities that courts have regarded as fair use: “quotation of excerpts in a review or criticism for purposes of illustration or comment; quotation of short passages in a scholarly or technical work, for illustration or clarification of the author’s observations; use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied; summary of an address or article, with brief quotations, in a news report.”

The safest course is always to get permission from the copyright owner before using copyrighted material.

From an 1841 case quoted in the Wikipedia Fair Use entry.

[A] reviewer may fairly cite largely from the original work, if his design be really and truly to use the passages for the purposes of fair and reasonable criticism. On the other hand, it is as clear, that if he thus cites the most important parts of the work, with a view, not to criticise, but to supersede the use of the original work, and substitute the review for it, such a use will be deemed in law a piracy.

(Both these quotes are governmental, and thus are allowed to be copied under fair use)

No Comments »

Fair use and blogging, effect upon work’s value

From Wikipedia on Fair Use

The fourth factor [the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.] measures the effect that the allegedly infringing use has had on the copyright owner’s ability to exploit his original work. The court not only investigates whether the defendant’s specific use of the work has significantly harmed the copyright owner’s market, but also whether such uses in general, if widespread, would harm the potential market of the original. The burden of proof here rests on the defendant for commercial uses, but on the copyright owner for noncommercial uses.

Hmmm, does this mean the criteria is less stringent for a blog like this that has no ads and doesn’t take contributions than it would be for a blog making $5,000 a week from BlogAds? Anyone know?

If I copy a graphic image from a photographer’s site to my blog, then it then gets blogged everywhere to the point that sales for his artwork drop, then my copying would almost certainly not be fair use. This seems much more obvious when copying artwork, but applies just as much to the written word too.

2 Comments »

Fair Use and blogging, Creative Commons

Creative Commons is a nonprofit organization that offers flexible copyright licenses for creative works.

This is a great way for blogs and websites to allow their content to be shared under criteria of their choosing.

Polizeros now displays a Creative Commons “Attribution- NonCommercial- ShareAlike 2.5 License” at the bottom of each page. This means anyone can use content here as long as they 1) attribute it to Polizeros, 2) do not use it for commercial purposes, and 3) if they share that content with others, it must be done with the same type of license.

Thus, no one needs to ask if they can copy content from Polizeros, the Creative Commons license grants them that right. Other websites might consider doing the same. As part of this continuing series on fair use, I’ve been quoting from EFF and Fair Use Network, both of whom have Creative Commons licenses.

(If you have a WordPress blog, get the Creative Commons plug-in.)

No Comments »

Fair Use and blogging, the 4 criteria

The Fair Use Network details the legal criteria in determining fair use, for example, a blogger posting content from a newspaper article.

1. The purpose and character of the use — whether the new use is commercial, nonprofit, or educational, among other relevant characteristics; and whether it is “transformative” or merely substitutes for the original.

Adding your thoughts and comments to the copied material can make it transformative vs. a straight copy with no comments, which is not. Short quotes are always better.

2. The nature of the original work — whether the original work is factual or creative; published or unpublished; in or out of print.

Factual and/or published generally tilts towards fair use, creative and/or unpublished doesn’t.

3. How much, and how substantial a part, of the original was taken — whether more was taken than needed, or whether the “heart of the work” was taken.

The “heart” of the matter can be quite small and still be considered NOT to be fair use.

4. The effect of the new use on the market for or value of the original work — whether the new use substitutes for the original work in the commercial marketplace, or reduces its value by supplanting demand for the original.

This is the big factor. Does your copying mean the original author could lose income or could there be less demand for it? If so, it’s probably not fair use.

EFF also has a useful explanation of the the 4 criteria. They note that noncommercial use is more likely to be fair and linking back to the original helps reduce the substitution effect. Linking back, in my view, should always be done, both for ethical and legal reasons. EFF also explains that simply because a site says, for instance, you can only copy a few lines, that would be their guideline, and is not the law.

No Comments »

Fair use and blogging, types of media

Many blogs and websites encourage you to copy and link to their material. However, mainstream media may specifically rule out posting their content elsewhere. The L.A. Times says personal use does not include posting to a website and the Houston Chronicle says “no reproduction except for limited personal use.” So while fair use might mean you can quote from them (and lots of blogs do just that) be aware they could consider doing so to be copyright infringement and they have lots of lawyers and you probably don’t. Also both newspapers are owned by large media companies so it’s probably safe to say these are company-wide policies. However, their company policy of no quoting is just that, policy, while fair use is law.

EFF has an informative Bloggers’ FAQ on Intellectual Property. Highlights include the following. Facts and ideas are ok to copy, the way they are expressed is what is copyrighted. Anything from a government document can be copied. Parody is a type of fair use. Satire, which uses the quoted material to mock something else is not as protected.

Blogs in general, want you to copy their text and link to them. That’s what blogging is about. Just don’t quote huge blocks of text, and always link back to the source. But this isn’t a given, as is nothing in Fair Use.

If you aren’t sure, you can always ask for permission or paraphrase what you want to quote.

2 Comments »

Fair Use and blogging

(This is the first in a series of posts on Fair Use and blogging)

Many bloggers, including me until I researched it, assume “Fair Use” means you can quote freely from any news source on your blog without fear of copyright infringement. Sorry to pop the bubble, but this just ain’t so.

Short quotations are generally considered fair use. Adding your own thoughts and comments is “transformative”, and thus aids in having it considered fair use. So is doing a parody of the quoted text. Satire, though, isn’t treated the same as parody because it’s not transformative.

Confused? Me too. There are no clear guidelines, no absolute way to judge. The most important criteria is the effect on the market. If by copying the text you decrease its current or future market value, then it probably isn’t fair use. For example, if you extensively quote from an article that someone was paid to write, and it can be shown they lost income because no one wanted to pay to re-publish it after that, then they could have grounds to recover that income.

A few guidelines.

Keep the quotes brief.
Add your own thoughts and comments.
Always provide a link back to the original article.
Try paraphrasing, maybe you don’t need to quote.

No Comments »