“Obama reveals his philosophy of government – tax cuts, deregulation, downsizing government – and then calls it a sharp contrast to Romney’s!” — Doug Henwood
With the exception of a few social issues, Romney and Obama are identical. Both favor endless wars and continual bailing out of corrupt bankers at the expense of the rest of us.
We need real change in this country, not a pretend election where nothing of substance will be debated and where the candidates are bought and paid for by corporate and financil interests.
We need something like what is about to happen in Greece where the hard left is expected to win the election on Sunday then tell the banksters to shove it.
Well said. This country needs a president like FDR who had a backbone and threw around his power and told congress to cooperate or get the hell out of the way.
He also said of the upper class (of which he was a member), “I welcome their hatred.”
Seems that Obama is finally getting a backbone, but I think it’s only because he needs to stop looking like such a pussy to the American public when it comes to congress pushing him around. The sad part is I think he’s just doing it to be re-elected for another 4 years. If Romney is elected expect a lot of spending cuts to the poor and middle class, lower taxes for the rich, high taxes for the poor and middle class, and a lot of deregulation. All of which we don’t need and will further the economic crisis we all are living in.
We totally need regulation. Because the increase in regulation (frank-dodd) stopped jp morgan from misinvesting 200 bil last quarter. /sarc/ we started “regulating” drugs in 1970 and now no one uses them /sarc/
So maybe what im saying isn’t that we need deregulation, but just that regulation wont help you. Even with regulation you’ll still be a loser. Sorry if that stings too much.
When you bailout banks (you can blame it on bush all you like, obama voted for TARP though) you say, if you go bankrupt, it wont matter, we will give you money. Because that + regulation ALWAYS equals better outcomes for the lower classes /retarrd/
We totally need regulation. Because the increase in regulation (frank-dodd) stopped jp morgan from misinvesting 200 bil last quarter. /sarc/ we started “regulating” drugs in 1970 and now no one uses them /sarc/
So maybe what im saying isn’t that we need deregulation, but just that regulation wont help you. Even with regulation you’ll still be a loser. Sorry if that stings too much.
When you bailout banks (you can blame it on bush all you like, obama voted for TARP though) you say, if you go bankrupt, it wont matter, we will give you money. Because that + regulation ALWAYS equals better outcomes for the lower classes /retarrd/
Obama has plenty of backbone when it comes to ordering people killed in countries we are not at war with and for bailing out corrupt, insolvent banks.