“There is information . . . of her getting extraordinary tips, if you know what I mean. And it’s not for bringing extra f–king towels,” a source close to the defense investigation said yesterday.
This is from the defense but it fits what has been emerging. From day one, Sue thought the housekeepper could have been a prostitute and the deal somehow went wrong. This doesn’t mean she wasn’t attacked by DSK but her credibility is gone. She claimed she was gang-raped in Guinea and wasn’t, so she’s already made a false claim of rape. There’s more too, read the article.
It would take the allegations of rape to another level if the maid was discovered to be a drug dealer sharing her profits with the employees union. The maid was illiterate and could not read or write, but she knew her way around the drug and prostitution business making her qualified to be hired in the best hotel. She was forced to kickback most of her earnings and kept very little for herself making her a black slave and the union her pimp. The 15 private investigators hired by DSK have uncovered this information and DSK is now in the position to sue NYC for billions after the rape charges are dropped.
I have maintained from the first news that “this could easily be a prostitution arrangment gone wrong, or mistaken identity (he thought she was the prostitute he ordered), or ‘dot-dot-dot-question-mark'” *We* can’t judge the matter, because we don’t have all of the facts. We don’t *know* he is guilty, we don’t *know* he is innocent, we don’t *know* if she is or is not telling the truth. It is always best to maintain that the accused is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
NY Post is now saying she and DSK had sex and he refused to pay