<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Direct solar to hydrogen in Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polizeros.com/2008/02/22/direct-solar-to-hydrogen-in-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polizeros.com/2008/02/22/direct-solar-to-hydrogen-in-australia/</link>
	<description>Musings on politics: Antiwar, global warming, peak oil and otherwise</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2008/02/22/direct-solar-to-hydrogen-in-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-149104</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2008/02/22/direct-solar-to-hydrogen-in-australia/#comment-149104</guid>
		<description>Producing hydrogen/oxygen is one use of planned excess solar energy.  If hydrogen and and oxygen are stored, under pressure, for use in semi-permiable membrane fuel cell technolgoy at night it will work.  What is the scale?  However, there might be more efficent, and safer,  energy storage techniques which allow massive solar energy farms in, say deserts, which do not have an abundance of water.  Good idea.  We need more chit chat on this topic.  Thanks fo rthe post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Producing hydrogen/oxygen is one use of planned excess solar energy.  If hydrogen and and oxygen are stored, under pressure, for use in semi-permiable membrane fuel cell technolgoy at night it will work.  What is the scale?  However, there might be more efficent, and safer,  energy storage techniques which allow massive solar energy farms in, say deserts, which do not have an abundance of water.  Good idea.  We need more chit chat on this topic.  Thanks fo rthe post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2008/02/22/direct-solar-to-hydrogen-in-australia/comment-page-1/#comment-149103</link>
		<dc:creator>alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2008/02/22/direct-solar-to-hydrogen-in-australia/#comment-149103</guid>
		<description>I really enjoy reading your blog, it always has great insight. But I am very frustrated with the mediaâ€™s lack of questions to the presidential candidates about global warming.  Now that it is down to just a few candidates I would think that this would be a bigger issue. 

Live Earth just picked up this topic and put out an article ( http://www.liveearth.org/news.php ) asking why the presidential candidates are not being solicited for their stance on the issue of the climate change. I just saw an article describing each candidateâ€™s stance on global warming and climate change on earthlab.com http://www.earthlab.com/articles/PresidentialCandidates.aspx . So obviously they care about it.  Is it the Medias fault for not asking the right questions or is it the candidatesâ€™ fault for not highlighting the right platforms? Does anyone know of other websites or articles that touch on this subject and candidatesâ€™ views?  This is the biggest problem of the century and for generations to comeâ€¦you would think the next president of the United States would be more vocal about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoy reading your blog, it always has great insight. But I am very frustrated with the mediaâ€™s lack of questions to the presidential candidates about global warming.  Now that it is down to just a few candidates I would think that this would be a bigger issue. </p>
<p>Live Earth just picked up this topic and put out an article ( <a href="http://www.liveearth.org/news.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.liveearth.org/news.php</a> ) asking why the presidential candidates are not being solicited for their stance on the issue of the climate change. I just saw an article describing each candidateâ€™s stance on global warming and climate change on earthlab.com <a href="http://www.earthlab.com/articles/PresidentialCandidates.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.earthlab.com/articles/PresidentialCandidates.aspx</a> . So obviously they care about it.  Is it the Medias fault for not asking the right questions or is it the candidatesâ€™ fault for not highlighting the right platforms? Does anyone know of other websites or articles that touch on this subject and candidatesâ€™ views?  This is the biggest problem of the century and for generations to comeâ€¦you would think the next president of the United States would be more vocal about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
