<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jingle mail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polizeros.com/2008/01/29/jingle-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polizeros.com/2008/01/29/jingle-mail/</link>
	<description>Musings on politics: anti-war, global warming, peak oil and otherwise</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2008/01/29/jingle-mail/#comment-148126</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 01:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2008/01/29/jingle-mail/#comment-148126</guid>
		<description>On the off-topic of water, interestingly a local radio station aired a climate modeler and climate historian who both agreed that northern Utah would not only get warmer, but wetter as well.  So the generalization that the entire southwest will dry out may not be accurate.  (Unfortunately, I live in SOUTHERN Utah, which they said will NOT get wetter-- but it may not get drier.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the off-topic of water, interestingly a local radio station aired a climate modeler and climate historian who both agreed that northern Utah would not only get warmer, but wetter as well.  So the generalization that the entire southwest will dry out may not be accurate.  (Unfortunately, I live in SOUTHERN Utah, which they said will NOT get wetter&#8211; but it may not get drier.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Morris</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2008/01/29/jingle-mail/#comment-148121</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2008/01/29/jingle-mail/#comment-148121</guid>
		<description>It appears that plenty of people are abandoning their homes while they still have some money left, rather than pay reset mortgage rates they can't afford as the home declines in value.

And really, why shouldn't they walk away? Staying would be even more financially ruinous.

Yes, others also have opined there may be a reverse migration from the arid southwest back to northern states where there are still ample water supplies.

Here in CT we were actually in a moderate drought, as defined by the government, in the summer and fall. Then the rain and snow came, we went to mild drought, then extremely dry, now it is officially over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that plenty of people are abandoning their homes while they still have some money left, rather than pay reset mortgage rates they can&#8217;t afford as the home declines in value.</p>
<p>And really, why shouldn&#8217;t they walk away? Staying would be even more financially ruinous.</p>
<p>Yes, others also have opined there may be a reverse migration from the arid southwest back to northern states where there are still ample water supplies.</p>
<p>Here in CT we were actually in a moderate drought, as defined by the government, in the summer and fall. Then the rain and snow came, we went to mild drought, then extremely dry, now it is officially over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten Bears</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2008/01/29/jingle-mail/#comment-148100</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten Bears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2008/01/29/jingle-mail/#comment-148100</guid>
		<description>As an exercise in psycho-history, I've been using the Anasazi abandonment model as the base micro-population in my, ahhhh... anticipations of the behavior pattern of the larger model as it applies to historical cyclical water patterns across the west, where water is a factor equally weighted as humans. Nice touch, that; haunting.

The trouble with this statistical model is the answer is always 'they're gonna' move here'.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an exercise in psycho-history, I&#8217;ve been using the Anasazi abandonment model as the base micro-population in my, ahhhh&#8230; anticipations of the behavior pattern of the larger model as it applies to historical cyclical water patterns across the west, where water is a factor equally weighted as humans. Nice touch, that; haunting.</p>
<p>The trouble with this statistical model is the answer is always &#8216;they&#8217;re gonna&#8217; move here&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2008/01/29/jingle-mail/#comment-148095</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2008/01/29/jingle-mail/#comment-148095</guid>
		<description>That's one reason I wonder about making Cancellation of Debt (COD) income nontaxable.  It's ALREADY non-taxable if you're insolvent-- and that's almost everyone forced into foreclosure, because if they had the money they'd have paid it.  

The new law makes COD nontaxable for your principle residence even when you're not insolvent.  Why would we want to give people a tax break for walking away if they don't have to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s one reason I wonder about making Cancellation of Debt (COD) income nontaxable.  It&#8217;s ALREADY non-taxable if you&#8217;re insolvent&#8211; and that&#8217;s almost everyone forced into foreclosure, because if they had the money they&#8217;d have paid it.  </p>
<p>The new law makes COD nontaxable for your principle residence even when you&#8217;re not insolvent.  Why would we want to give people a tax break for walking away if they don&#8217;t have to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
