<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America: Neck-deep in netwar, and losing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polizeros.com/2007/08/20/america-neck-deep-in-netwar-and-losing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polizeros.com/2007/08/20/america-neck-deep-in-netwar-and-losing/</link>
	<description>Musings on politics: anti-war, global warming, peak oil and otherwise</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2007/08/20/america-neck-deep-in-netwar-and-losing/#comment-140195</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2007/08/20/america-neck-deep-in-netwar-and-losing/#comment-140195</guid>
		<description>"Al Qaeda and other such extremists who warp and twist the nonviolent precepts of a major religion to suit their violent ends are, to state the obvious, dangerous."

Entirely true.  But one of the points you don't mention is that American foreign policy is often driven by a similarly twisted religion-- Christianity coopted by nationalism.  Historically there are two ways to counter such an abomination: secularism that supercedes all religion, and a spiritual revival strong enough to call people back to the roots of the coopted religion.  

Given the religious history of the U.S., secularism is unlikely to work.  (Indeed, it has been tried and has the opposite effect.)  Thus the only remaining option is a spiritual "revolution," a call to return to the trachings of Jesus of Nazareth.

Oh, there is a third option: destruction of the nation.  Hopefully it won't come to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Al Qaeda and other such extremists who warp and twist the nonviolent precepts of a major religion to suit their violent ends are, to state the obvious, dangerous.&#8221;</p>
<p>Entirely true.  But one of the points you don&#8217;t mention is that American foreign policy is often driven by a similarly twisted religion&#8211; Christianity coopted by nationalism.  Historically there are two ways to counter such an abomination: secularism that supercedes all religion, and a spiritual revival strong enough to call people back to the roots of the coopted religion.  </p>
<p>Given the religious history of the U.S., secularism is unlikely to work.  (Indeed, it has been tried and has the opposite effect.)  Thus the only remaining option is a spiritual &#8220;revolution,&#8221; a call to return to the trachings of Jesus of Nazareth.</p>
<p>Oh, there is a third option: destruction of the nation.  Hopefully it won&#8217;t come to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
