<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mexico: A nation-state dissolves?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polizeros.com/2007/07/13/mexico-a-nation-state-dissolves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polizeros.com/2007/07/13/mexico-a-nation-state-dissolves/</link>
	<description>Musings on politics: anti-war, global warming, peak oil and otherwise</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2007/07/13/mexico-a-nation-state-dissolves/#comment-139236</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 18:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2007/07/13/mexico-a-nation-state-dissolves/#comment-139236</guid>
		<description>Much like a proactive "enemy-prevention" foreign policy, legalizing drugs is far too sensible to survive the political process.  I have often wondered, with politicians battling essentially to keep prices high, how could they NOT have a vested interest in the drug trade?  

Parts of the government have been involved in the trade, from smuggling heroin in the 1970s, to flying pot and cocaine into Georgia in the 1980s, to (if you believe the reports) inventing and promoting crack in the late 1980s and 1990s.  If prices go down, the cartels may not be the only ones who lose.

Maybe, when the government said it was interested in national security, you thought they meant OUR security?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much like a proactive &#8220;enemy-prevention&#8221; foreign policy, legalizing drugs is far too sensible to survive the political process.  I have often wondered, with politicians battling essentially to keep prices high, how could they NOT have a vested interest in the drug trade?  </p>
<p>Parts of the government have been involved in the trade, from smuggling heroin in the 1970s, to flying pot and cocaine into Georgia in the 1980s, to (if you believe the reports) inventing and promoting crack in the late 1980s and 1990s.  If prices go down, the cartels may not be the only ones who lose.</p>
<p>Maybe, when the government said it was interested in national security, you thought they meant OUR security?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Hartley</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2007/07/13/mexico-a-nation-state-dissolves/#comment-139234</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Hartley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2007/07/13/mexico-a-nation-state-dissolves/#comment-139234</guid>
		<description>It occurs to me that we may have to legalize drugs to clear out the gangs in Mexico, Central America, and Colombia. Interesting to see what the drug lords would do with their cash as supplies became cheap and plentiful.

I love it:  legalize drugs as part of the national security policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurs to me that we may have to legalize drugs to clear out the gangs in Mexico, Central America, and Colombia. Interesting to see what the drug lords would do with their cash as supplies became cheap and plentiful.</p>
<p>I love it:  legalize drugs as part of the national security policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
