<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bringing in the big guns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://polizeros.com/2007/05/31/bringing-in-the-big-guns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://polizeros.com/2007/05/31/bringing-in-the-big-guns/</link>
	<description>Musings on politics: anti-war, global warming, peak oil and otherwise</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2007/05/31/bringing-in-the-big-guns/#comment-138823</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 14:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2007/05/31/bringing-in-the-big-guns/#comment-138823</guid>
		<description>One of the most profound experiences I've had was to visit Varanasi, India, which is considered a holy place for Hindus to die.  Shortly after my arrival, I observed a funeral procession: dozens of men and women dancing in the street, following a wooden stretcher on which lay the flower-covered body of an old man.  They took the stretcher down to the banks of the Ganges River, set it on a pile of wood, lit it on fire, and watched it burn.  Afterwards, the ashes were thrown into the river.

Environmental aspects aside, this was the first time I'd seen death dealt with as what it is: an inevitable and natural part of our life cycle.  In contrast, Americans spend literally billions of dollars treating death as a disease that needs to be cured-- and feared.  The Indian approach is clearly more cost-effective.  Which approach do you suppose supports better emotional health?

Ram Dass, the former Harvard professor turned guru, says something interesting: "The one thing you need to know about death is that it's perfectly safe."  That'll bend an American mind just a little-- and makes one question the role of Adam Smith in medicine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most profound experiences I&#8217;ve had was to visit Varanasi, India, which is considered a holy place for Hindus to die.  Shortly after my arrival, I observed a funeral procession: dozens of men and women dancing in the street, following a wooden stretcher on which lay the flower-covered body of an old man.  They took the stretcher down to the banks of the Ganges River, set it on a pile of wood, lit it on fire, and watched it burn.  Afterwards, the ashes were thrown into the river.</p>
<p>Environmental aspects aside, this was the first time I&#8217;d seen death dealt with as what it is: an inevitable and natural part of our life cycle.  In contrast, Americans spend literally billions of dollars treating death as a disease that needs to be cured&#8211; and feared.  The Indian approach is clearly more cost-effective.  Which approach do you suppose supports better emotional health?</p>
<p>Ram Dass, the former Harvard professor turned guru, says something interesting: &#8220;The one thing you need to know about death is that it&#8217;s perfectly safe.&#8221;  That&#8217;ll bend an American mind just a little&#8211; and makes one question the role of Adam Smith in medicine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Ware</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2007/05/31/bringing-in-the-big-guns/#comment-138819</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ware</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 00:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2007/05/31/bringing-in-the-big-guns/#comment-138819</guid>
		<description>A couple of years ago I went through stage one with my wife, and I openly questioned "The Cancer Industry's" motives, Adam Smith and all that... cost &lt;i&gt;me/i&#62; twenty-eight thousand dollars. Now I'm not so sure.

We seem to be living beyond our means...&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of years ago I went through stage one with my wife, and I openly questioned &#8220;The Cancer Industry&#8217;s&#8221; motives, Adam Smith and all that&#8230; cost <i>me/i&gt; twenty-eight thousand dollars. Now I&#8217;m not so sure.</p>
<p>We seem to be living beyond our means&#8230;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Morris</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2007/05/31/bringing-in-the-big-guns/#comment-138817</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 22:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2007/05/31/bringing-in-the-big-guns/#comment-138817</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;"what doesn't kill you makes you stronger" Sigh.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;what doesn&#8217;t kill you makes you stronger&#8221; Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://polizeros.com/2007/05/31/bringing-in-the-big-guns/#comment-138815</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 18:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://polizeros.com/2007/05/31/bringing-in-the-big-guns/#comment-138815</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry to hear about your friend.  I hope she recovers.

As to the problem of evil, here's my opinion for what it's worth: The classic question of the Judeo-Christian theologians is called "&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodicy" rel="nofollow"&gt;theodicy&lt;/a&gt;"-- "If God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving, how can He allow evil to exist?"  Various philosophers and theologians have come to different answers to this riddle-- and certain varieties of modern American Christianity seem to explain it by limiting God's power and saying that Satan holds sway here on earth.  But within the framework of orthodox Christian theology there can be only one answer: evil does not exist.  What we think of as evil is merely stuff we don't like and don't understand the reason for.

For a long time, I didn't believe this.  Surely, for example, the Nazi extermination camps were a manifestation of evil.  Yet when I read the philosophy of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Frankl" rel="nofollow"&gt;Viktor Frankl&lt;/a&gt;, which was so profoundly influenced by his experience as a resident in the camps, I have to ask: could something so good come out of something that was pure evil?  No, it could not.  

To be clear, I would never wish that kind of suffering on anyone, and I have worked and will continue to work to end suffering caused by human violence.  But when God challenges us with what sometimes seem to be unspeakable trials, we as human beings often respond by rising to levels not otherwise possible.  That doesn't mean we have to like it, and indeed I believe that the greatest work we can do is to work to end the suffering caused by acts of ignorance and selfishness.  But it doesn't make those acts evil, either.

A paradox: Adversity builds character-- yet we seek to shield ourselves and others from adversity.  It is an odd existence we mortals live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to hear about your friend.  I hope she recovers.</p>
<p>As to the problem of evil, here&#8217;s my opinion for what it&#8217;s worth: The classic question of the Judeo-Christian theologians is called &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodicy" rel="nofollow">theodicy</a>&#8220;&#8211; &#8220;If God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-loving, how can He allow evil to exist?&#8221;  Various philosophers and theologians have come to different answers to this riddle&#8211; and certain varieties of modern American Christianity seem to explain it by limiting God&#8217;s power and saying that Satan holds sway here on earth.  But within the framework of orthodox Christian theology there can be only one answer: evil does not exist.  What we think of as evil is merely stuff we don&#8217;t like and don&#8217;t understand the reason for.</p>
<p>For a long time, I didn&#8217;t believe this.  Surely, for example, the Nazi extermination camps were a manifestation of evil.  Yet when I read the philosophy of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Frankl" rel="nofollow">Viktor Frankl</a>, which was so profoundly influenced by his experience as a resident in the camps, I have to ask: could something so good come out of something that was pure evil?  No, it could not.  </p>
<p>To be clear, I would never wish that kind of suffering on anyone, and I have worked and will continue to work to end suffering caused by human violence.  But when God challenges us with what sometimes seem to be unspeakable trials, we as human beings often respond by rising to levels not otherwise possible.  That doesn&#8217;t mean we have to like it, and indeed I believe that the greatest work we can do is to work to end the suffering caused by acts of ignorance and selfishness.  But it doesn&#8217;t make those acts evil, either.</p>
<p>A paradox: Adversity builds character&#8211; yet we seek to shield ourselves and others from adversity.  It is an odd existence we mortals live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
