Archive for August 15th, 2006


Right-wing campaign video

A newly released national political campaign video shows “footage of Osama bin Laden, referred to an increase in terror attacks, highlighted illegal immigration and pointed out the nuclear aspirations of Iran and North Korea.”

So, it’s from the Republican Party, right? Nope. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee continues in their brain-damaged attempt to out-right the right while pretending to offer change. Here’s a clue for them. Be anti-war. The public is.

No Comments »

Feeling dazed and confused?

These are insane, turbulent times. The neocons continue to want ever more wars even as their previous wars turn against them. Religious fundamentalists in the White House condemn religious fundamentalists in Iraq. Terror alerts scare the populace silly, as the right wing says we need less rights and more repression, and this will make us free. The litany of madness seems unending, doesn’t it?

Yet, things ARE changing. Public opinion has shifted firmly against the neocon agenda. The Dems may well pick up both houses (assuming they don’t blow it, always a possibility.) While the Democrats won’t be much improvement, this would still be a major victory for the left, as the extremist right-wing agenda of the neocon will then become history.

The Lamont victory was significant. Anti-war sentiment is growing fast, even if he is no different from Lieberman on Lebanon. The populace is ahead of the politicians on this, a promising sign indeed. Once the electorate realizes the Democrats are just the kinder, gentler arm of the same imperialism that created all these wars, then genuine radicalism may well occur.

There were considerable numbers of Muslims, Arabs, and those of Middle Eastern ancestry at the marches on Saturday. While in the past there might have been apprehension from these communities about being at a demo, they turned out in large numbers indeed to protest.

That’s what we all need to do. Turn out in large numbers. Protest. Organize. The pendulum is swinging our way. Let’s take advantage of it.

1 Comment »

Reality must never be permitted to intrude

Not on Planet Dubya, nosiree, we’ll have no unpleasant intrusions by facts and logic here.

Meanwhile, the President is attacked, presumably by those who hate freedom and love the terrorists. Even if they themselves used to say that anyone who attacked Bush hated freedom and loved the terrorists.

And even Israeli public opinion doesn’t agree with him.

No Comments »

Fair use and blogging, effect upon work’s value

From Wikipedia on Fair Use

The fourth factor [the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.] measures the effect that the allegedly infringing use has had on the copyright owner’s ability to exploit his original work. The court not only investigates whether the defendant’s specific use of the work has significantly harmed the copyright owner’s market, but also whether such uses in general, if widespread, would harm the potential market of the original. The burden of proof here rests on the defendant for commercial uses, but on the copyright owner for noncommercial uses.

Hmmm, does this mean the criteria is less stringent for a blog like this that has no ads and doesn’t take contributions than it would be for a blog making $5,000 a week from BlogAds? Anyone know?

If I copy a graphic image from a photographer’s site to my blog, then it then gets blogged everywhere to the point that sales for his artwork drop, then my copying would almost certainly not be fair use. This seems much more obvious when copying artwork, but applies just as much to the written word too.

2 Comments »