Archive for January 28th, 2004


The MyDoom worm. Cyber warfare.

The MyDoom worm. Cyber warfare.


I got, oh, 200 emails with the worm yesterday, and more today. You’re no doubt getting them too. The worm is mutating, a new, just discovered variant attacks Microsoft.com,  while the original attacks SCO.com (and appears to be doing it’s job rather well too, as the site is dead).


You non geeks out there must wonder, what is going on? Ok, SCO says they own Linux source code and that those using Linux open source software will now have to pay them royalties (it’s being litigated now, with IBM and Intel opposed to SCO). To the open source movement, this was a declaration of war. So, someone retaliated.


MyDoom is a worm that sends copies of itself to everyone in your email address book, and it includes the payload, a 22k zip file, which if opened and run, will, starting on Feb. 1 (although it appears to have already started) repeatedly and endlessly try to access SCO.com. Get the picure? Let’s say 10,000 PCs scattered worldwide all try to access SCO.com, oh, 20,000 times a day. The website would soon be non-functional. And that is the intent. To bring SCO and their website, to their knees


And now this new variant attacks Microsoft.com


For the deep geeks out there, this story has lots of detail.


PS If you 1) delete the emails when they come, 2) don’t open the zip files, and 3) update your antivirus software, you’ll be quite safe.


PPS



In response to being targeted by the MyDoom virus, which has been crowned in press reports as “the worst virus ever,” the SCO Group is offering a US$250,000 bounty for information leading to the arrest and conviction of its creator.

No Comments »

In case you harbor illusions…

In case you harbor illusions Kerry is even slightly anti-war


From his campaign website

First, he says, install the UN in Iraq because this “will remove the stigma  of foreign occupation from our presence there.” Wow, how noble of you, John, letting the UN to do our dirty work so we don’t appear tainted.


Under Kerry, we damn well will control Iraq.



The United States has ample power and influence to establish a working relationship which guarantees— indeed guides us to—an outcome which meets our goals and security needs.


Like Wesley Clark, he wants more troops and occupations, not less.



As we internationalize the work in Iraq, we need to add 40,000 troops – the equivalent of two divisions – to the American military in order to meet our responsibilities elsewhere – especially in the urgent global war on terror.  In my first 100 days as President, I will move to increase the size of our Armed Forces. Some may not like that.


Whew, we’re dealing with a razor keen intellect here, eh? You betcha some won’t like more US troops occupying yet more areas of the globe. ANSWER will no doubt have 100,000 in the streets of DC to greet his inauguration, should it occur. Invading more countries will not stop terrorism, because, among other reasons, the terrorism is not state-sponsored. However it will most certainly encourage insurgents to attack us - which guarantees soldiers coming home in body bags and more hatred against us due to our arrogant We Are The King, Bow Down style of “diplomacy.”


As for the Iraqi people, he offers this condescending statement



Genuinely engaging the Iraqi people in shaping new institutions is fundamental to the long term cause of a stable, peaceful, and independent Iraq that contributes to the world instead of threatening it.


Oh those silly Iraqis, let’s pat them on the head, and encourage them to be good little boys and girls - while we keep a watchful eye on their oil, of course.


His conclusion



We must change a course of unilateralism and pre-emptive war that is radically wrong for America.


Yet by his own words, he wants more troops, more occupation, and an Iraq government that meets his terms not one chosen democratically by them. This a plan for more war, not for peace, and it differs little from what Bush is doing.


Reading Kerry’s apologia for war which pretends to be an “alternative”, I’m reminded of Peter Camejo’s recent Avocado Declaration.



History shows that the Democrats and Republicans are not two counterpoised forces, but rather complementary halves of a single two-party system: “one animal with two heads that feed from the same trough,”


Since the Civil War the two parties show differences in their image, role, social base and some policies but in the last analysis, they both support essentially similar economic platforms.


When social justice, peace or civil rights movements become massive in scale, and threaten to become uncontrollable and begin to win over large numbers of people, the Democratic Party begins to shift and presents itself as a supposed ally. Its goal is always to co-opt the movement, demobilize its forces and block its development into an alternative, independent political force.


And that’s precisely what’s happening now. With Dean now effectively out of the race, even his weak anti-war voice will be gone. In its place are Democrats who pretend to be different, but really aren’t.



The Democratic Party preaches defeatism to the most oppressed and exploited. Nothing can be expected, nothing is possible but what exists. To the people they justify continuous betrayal of the possibility for real change with the argument of lesser evil. It’s the Republicans or us. Nothing else is possible.


The Democrats have no candidate who will do anything different in Iraq than what Bush is doing now, nor are their economic policies much different.


A Kerry candidacy might aid a strong Green Party run, as the disaffected look for alternatives to the Dems. As I’ve said before, the Green nomination is probably Camejo’s, if he wants it. You can sign a petition urging him to run.


Update:


Jake of Lying Media Bastards sums it up well in comments to this post.



Well, my top priority is getting George W. Sociopath out of the White House. And as soon as one of these new Democratic bastards takes over, I’m going to oppose their idiocy too.

No Comments »

Schwarzenneger loan for recall ruled…

Schwarzenneger loan for recall ruled illegal



A Superior Court judge ruled Monday that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger violated state election law by using a $4.5-million bank loan to help finance his campaign in last fall’s recall race.


Superior Court Judge Loren E. McMaster, saying that such loans could open the way for money laundering of campaign donations, ordered Schwarzenegger to cease raising money to retire the debt, and not use money he has already raised to repay the loan.

No Comments »

Supremes to rule on death…

Supremes to rule on death penalty for teens



Outside the United States, all nations have pledged to end executions for juvenile murderers. In the past decade, the Democratic Republic of Congo, China, Pakistan and Iran have carried out executions of young killers but are now committed to ending the practice, according to Amnesty International.


It is grotesque that we are the only country that still executes children.

No Comments »