Politics in the Zeros. The politics of progress; cleantech, the economy. anti-war

Hey!

Hey!


Wasn’t Iraq supposed to have weapons of mass destruction (WMD)? Wasn’t that why we invaded?? So, why haven’t we found any?


Rather than answers, there is only chaos:



“Sources inside the Bush administration described the hunt for weapons as beset by infighting and potentially disastrous delays, and suggested that stocks of chemical and biological agents themselves might never be found.”


“Everybody realises that it’s gotten off to a rocky start,” one official closely involved in the weapons search told the Los Angeles Times. “Frankly, the whole situation is very confusing at the moment.”


Why would there be infighting about finding WMD’s? And why wouldn’t finding them be a top priority?

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Posterous

Comments are closed.

Comments subject to deletion at whim of capricious webmaster. Disagreements are ok. Flames, trolls, and right-wing attacks are not. If your comment doesn't appear immediately, then moderation is on, thus there's no need to re-send it.
(However sometimes the anti-spam programs here go awry. Email us if your comments seem to vanish into the void.)